Overview<strong>Energy</strong> Trends <strong>to</strong> <strong>2030</strong>The <strong>Energy</strong> Information Administration (EIA), inpreparing projections for the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong><strong>2006</strong> (AEO<strong>2006</strong>), evaluated a wide range of trendsand issues that could have major implications for U.S.energy markets between <strong>to</strong>day and <strong>2030</strong>. AEO<strong>2006</strong> isthe first edition of the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> (AEO)<strong>to</strong> provide projections through <strong>2030</strong>. This overviewfocuses on one case, the reference case, which is presentedand compared <strong>with</strong> the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong>2005 (AEO2005) reference case.Trends in energy supply and demand are affected by alarge number of fac<strong>to</strong>rs that are difficult <strong>to</strong> predict,such as energy prices, U.S. economic growth,advances in technologies, changes in weather patterns,and future public policy decisions. In preparingAEO<strong>2006</strong>, EIA reevaluated its prior expectationsabout world oil prices in light of the current circumstancesin oil markets. Since 2000, world oil priceshave risen sharply as supply has tightened, first as aresult of strong demand growth in developing economiessuch as China and later as a result of supply constraintsresulting from disruptions and inadequateinvestment <strong>to</strong> meet demand growth. As a result ofthis review, the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case includesmuch higher world oil prices than were projected inAEO2005. In the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case, worldcrude oil prices, which are now expressed in terms ofthe average price of imported low-sulfur crude oil <strong>to</strong>U.S. refiners, are projected <strong>to</strong> increase from $40.49per barrel (2004 dollars) in 2004 <strong>to</strong> $54.08 per barrelin 2025 (about $21 per barrel higher than the projected2025 price in AEO2005) and <strong>to</strong> $56.97 per barrelin <strong>2030</strong>.The higher world oil prices in the AEO<strong>2006</strong> referencecase have important implications for energy markets.The most significant impact is on the outlook for U.S.petroleum imports. Net imports of petroleum are projected<strong>to</strong> meet a growing share of <strong>to</strong>tal petroleumdemand in both AEO<strong>2006</strong> and AEO2005; however,the higher world oil prices in the AEO<strong>2006</strong> referencecase lead <strong>to</strong> more domestic crude oil production, lowerdemand for petroleum products, and consequentlylower levels of petroleum imports. Net petroleumimports are expected <strong>to</strong> account for 60 percent ofdemand (on the basis of barrels per day) in 2025 in theAEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case, up from 58 percent in 2004.In the AEO2005 reference case, net petroleumimports were projected <strong>to</strong> account for 68 percent ofU.S. petroleum demand in 2025.Higher world oil prices are also projected <strong>to</strong> affectfuel choice and vehicle efficiency decisions in thetransportation sec<strong>to</strong>r. Higher oil prices increase thedemand for unconventional sources of transportationfuel, such as ethanol and biodiesel, and are projected<strong>to</strong> stimulate coal-<strong>to</strong>-liquids (CTL) production in thereference case. In some of the alternative AEO<strong>2006</strong>cases, <strong>with</strong> even higher oil prices, domestic productionof liquid fuels from natural gas—“gas-<strong>to</strong>-liquids”(GTL)—is also stimulated. The production of alternativeliquid fuels is highly sensitive <strong>to</strong> oil price levels.The projected fuel economy of new light-duty vehiclesin the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case in 2025 is higher thanwas projected in the AEO2005 reference case, primarilybecause of higher petroleum prices. The AEO<strong>2006</strong>reference case does not include implementation of theproposed, but not yet final, increase in fuel economystandards based on vehicle footprint for lighttrucks—including pickups, sport utility vehicles, andminivans—for model years 2008 through 2011.Much of the increase in new light-duty vehicle fueleconomy in the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case reflectsgreater penetration by hybrid and diesel vehicles.Sales of “full hybrid” vehicles in 2025 are 31 percent(340,000 vehicles) higher in the AEO<strong>2006</strong> referencecase, and diesel vehicle sales are 29 percent (290,000vehicles) higher, than projected in the AEO2005 referencecase. In spite of the higher projected sales ofhybrid (1.5 million) and diesel (1.3 million) vehicles in2025, each is expected <strong>to</strong> account for only 7 percent ofnew vehicle sales in the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case,even though the projected hybrid sales are higherthan current industry expectations. The projectedWorld Oil Price Concept Used inAEO<strong>2006</strong>In previous AEOs, the world crude oil price wasdefined on the basis of the average importedrefiner acquisition cost of crude oil <strong>to</strong> the UnitedStates (IRAC), which represented the weightedaverage of all imported crude oil. His<strong>to</strong>rically, theIRAC price has tended <strong>to</strong> be a few dollars less thanthe widely cited prices of premium crudes, such asWest Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent, whichrefiners generally prefer for their low viscosity andsulfur content. In the past 2 years, the price differencebetween premium crudes and IRAC has widened—inparticular, the price spread betweenpremium crudes and heavier, high-sulfur crudes.In an effort <strong>to</strong> provide a crude oil price that is moreconsistent <strong>with</strong> those generally reported in themedia, AEO<strong>2006</strong> uses the average price ofimported low-sulfur crude oil <strong>to</strong> U.S. refiners.2 <strong>Energy</strong> Information Administration / <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong>
Overviewsales figures for hybrids do not include sales of “mildhybrids,” which like full hybrids incorporate an integratedstarter genera<strong>to</strong>r, that allows for improvedefficiency by shutting the engine off when the vehicleis idling, but do not incorporate an electric mo<strong>to</strong>r thatprovides tractive power <strong>to</strong> the vehicle when it ismoving.The AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case includes minimalmarket penetration by hydrogen fuel cell vehicles,as a result of State mandates. Although significantresearch and development (R&D) is being conductedthrough the FreedomCAR Program, a co-funded partnershipbetween the Federal Government and privateindustry, those efforts are not expected <strong>to</strong> have a significantimpact on the market for fuel cell vehiclesbefore <strong>2030</strong>.The AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case projection for U.S.imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) is lower thanwas projected in the AEO2005 reference case. LNGimports are projected <strong>to</strong> grow from 0.6 trillion cubicfeet in 2004 <strong>to</strong> 4.1 trillion cubic feet in 2025, as compared<strong>with</strong> 6.4 trillion cubic feet in the AEO2005 referencecase. More rapid growth in worldwide demandfor natural gas in the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference casereduces the availability of LNG supplies <strong>to</strong> the UnitedStates and raises worldwide natural gas prices, makingLNG less economical in U.S. markets.AEO<strong>2006</strong> includes consideration of the impacts of the<strong>Energy</strong> Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT2005), signed in<strong>to</strong>law on August 8, 2005. Consistent <strong>with</strong> the generalapproach adopted in the AEO, the reference case doesnot consider those sections of EPACT2005 thatrequire funding appropriations for implementationor sections <strong>with</strong> highly uncertain impacts on energymarkets. For example, EIA does not try <strong>to</strong> anticipatethe policy response <strong>to</strong> the many studies required byEPACT2005 or the impacts of the R&D fundingauthorizations included in the bill. The AEO<strong>2006</strong> referencecase includes only those sections of EPACT-2005 that establish specific tax credits, incentives, orstandards—about 30 of the roughly 500 sections inthe legislation.Of the EPACT2005 provisions analyzed, incentivesintended <strong>to</strong> stimulate the development of advancednuclear and renewable plants have particularly noteworthyimpacts. A <strong>to</strong>tal of 6 gigawatts of newly constructednuclear capacity is projected <strong>to</strong> be added by<strong>2030</strong> in the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case as a result of theincentives in EPACT2005.EPACT2005 also has important implications forenergy consumption in the residential and commercialsec<strong>to</strong>rs. In the residential sec<strong>to</strong>r, EPACT2005sets efficiency standards for <strong>to</strong>rchiere lamps, dehumidifiers,and ceiling fans and creates tax credits forenergy-efficient furnaces, water heaters, and air conditioners.It also allows home builders <strong>to</strong> claim taxcredits for energy-efficient new construction. In thecommercial sec<strong>to</strong>r, the legislation creates efficiencystandards that affect energy use in a number of commercialapplications. It also includes investment taxcredits for solar technologies, fuel cells, and microturbines.These policies are expected <strong>to</strong> help reduceenergy use for space conditioning and lighting in bothsec<strong>to</strong>rs.Economic GrowthThe projections for key interest rates—the Federalfunds rate, the nominal yield on the 10-year Treasurynote, and the AA utility bond rate—in the AEO<strong>2006</strong>reference case are slightly lower than those in theAEO2005 reference case. Also, the projected value ofindustrial shipments has been revised downward, inpart in response <strong>to</strong> the higher projected energy pricesin the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case.Despite the higher forecast for energy prices, grossdomestic product (GDP) is projected <strong>to</strong> grow at anaverage annual rate of 3.0 percent from 2004 <strong>to</strong> <strong>2030</strong>in AEO<strong>2006</strong>, identical <strong>to</strong> the projected growth ratefrom 2004 through 2025 in AEO2005. The ratio offinal energy expenditures <strong>to</strong> GDP has generally fallenover time and was only about 0.07 in 2004, down froma high of 0.14 during the 1970s. It is projected <strong>to</strong> fall<strong>to</strong> about 0.05 in <strong>2030</strong> as a result of continued declinesin energy use per unit of output and growth in otherareas of the economy. The main fac<strong>to</strong>rs influencinglong-term economic growth are growth in the laborforce and sustained growth in labor productivity, notenergy prices.<strong>Energy</strong> PricesIn the reference case—one of several cases included inAEO<strong>2006</strong>—the average world crude oil price continues<strong>to</strong> rise through <strong>2006</strong> and then declines <strong>to</strong> $46.90per barrel in 2014 (2004 dollars) as new supplies enterthe market. It then rises slowly <strong>to</strong> $54.08 per barrel in2025 (Figure 1), about $21 per barrel higher than theprice in AEO2005 ($32.95 per barrel). AlternativeAEO<strong>2006</strong> cases address higher and lower world oilprices.The prices in the AEO<strong>2006</strong> reference case reflect ashift in EIA’s thinking about long-term trends in oilmarkets. World oil markets have been extremely volatilefor the past several years, and EIA now believesthat the price path in AEO2005 did not fully reflectthe causes of that volatility and the implications for<strong>Energy</strong> Information Administration / <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> 3
- Page 1 and 2: DOE/EIA-0383(2006)February 2006Annu
- Page 3 and 4: DOE/EIA-0383(2006)Annual Energy Out
- Page 5 and 6: ContentsPageOverview ..............
- Page 7 and 8: ContentsFigures (Continued)Page11.
- Page 9: ContentsFigures (Continued)Page109.
- Page 14 and 15: Overviewlong-term average oil price
- Page 16 and 17: Overviewcubic feet in 2004 to 27.0
- Page 18 and 19: Overviewfrom 789 billion kilowattho
- Page 20 and 21: Overviewprojected to be built to se
- Page 23 and 24: Legislation andRegulations
- Page 25 and 26: Legislation and Regulationsand inst
- Page 27 and 28: Legislation and RegulationsIndustri
- Page 29 and 30: Legislation and RegulationsIn addit
- Page 31 and 32: Legislation and Regulationsland wil
- Page 33 and 34: Legislation and RegulationsTable 2.
- Page 35 and 36: Legislation and Regulations• Unde
- Page 37 and 38: Legislation and RegulationsProjects
- Page 39 and 40: Legislation and Regulationsplants w
- Page 41 and 42: Issues in Focus
- Page 43 and 44: Issues in Focusworld oil price incr
- Page 45 and 46: Issues in Focusand equipment will r
- Page 47 and 48: Issues in FocusAEO2006 Price CasesT
- Page 49 and 50: Issues in Focusbase in the high pri
- Page 51 and 52: Issues in Focusin gasification unit
- Page 53 and 54: Issues in Focusrevolutionize transp
- Page 55 and 56: Issues in Focussynthesis gas. Any o
- Page 57 and 58: Issues in Focusenvironmental impact
- Page 59 and 60: Issues in Focussubstantial incremen
- Page 61 and 62: Issues in FocusMarket penetration o
- Page 63 and 64:
Issues in FocusAccording to most an
- Page 65 and 66:
Issues in FocusThere are two leadin
- Page 67 and 68:
Issues in Focuscost reductions are
- Page 69 and 70:
Issues in Focusthe early years of t
- Page 71 and 72:
Market TrendsThe projections in AEO
- Page 73 and 74:
Trends in Economic ActivityOutput G
- Page 75 and 76:
Energy DemandAverage Energy Use per
- Page 77 and 78:
Residential Sector Energy DemandDem
- Page 79 and 80:
Commercial Sector Energy DemandEcon
- Page 81 and 82:
Industrial Sector Energy DemandAdva
- Page 83 and 84:
Industrial Sector Energy DemandEner
- Page 85 and 86:
Transportation Sector Energy Demand
- Page 87 and 88:
Electricity Demand and SupplyContin
- Page 89 and 90:
Electricity SupplyEPACT2005 Tax Cre
- Page 91 and 92:
Electricity From Renewable SourcesT
- Page 93 and 94:
Electricity Alternative CasesFaster
- Page 95 and 96:
Natural Gas DemandIncreases in Natu
- Page 97 and 98:
Natural Gas PricesProjected Natural
- Page 99 and 100:
Natural Gas Alternative CasesNatura
- Page 101 and 102:
Oil Prices and ProductionOil Prices
- Page 103 and 104:
Oil Price and Technology CasesU.S.
- Page 105 and 106:
Refined Petroleum ProductsTransport
- Page 107 and 108:
Ethanol and Synthetic FuelsU.S. Dem
- Page 109 and 110:
Coal Mine Employment and Coal Price
- Page 111 and 112:
Coal ConsumptionCoal-Fired Generato
- Page 113 and 114:
Carbon Dioxide EmissionsHigher Ener
- Page 115:
Nitrogen Oxide and Mercury Emission
- Page 118 and 119:
Forecast ComparisonsOnly GII produc
- Page 120 and 121:
Forecast Comparisonsconsumption and
- Page 122 and 123:
Forecast ComparisonsNatural GasPubl
- Page 124 and 125:
Forecast Comparisonsproviding about
- Page 126 and 127:
Forecast Comparisonsrefiners acquis
- Page 128 and 129:
Forecast Comparisonsconsumption. In
- Page 130 and 131:
Notes and SourcesText NotesLegislat
- Page 132 and 133:
Notes and Sources[48]These costs re
- Page 134 and 135:
Notes and SourcesTable Notes and So
- Page 136 and 137:
Notes and SourcesFigure 28. Energy
- Page 138 and 139:
Notes and SourcesFigure 81. Net imp
- Page 141:
Appendixes
- Page 144 and 145:
Reference Case
- Page 146 and 147:
Reference Case
- Page 148 and 149:
Reference Case
- Page 150 and 151:
Reference Case
- Page 152 and 153:
Reference Case
- Page 154 and 155:
Reference Case
- Page 156 and 157:
Reference Case
- Page 158 and 159:
Reference Case
- Page 160 and 161:
Reference Case
- Page 162 and 163:
Reference Case
- Page 164 and 165:
Reference Case
- Page 166 and 167:
Reference Case
- Page 168 and 169:
Reference Case
- Page 170 and 171:
Reference Case
- Page 172 and 173:
Reference Case
- Page 175 and 176:
Appendix BEconomic Growth Case Comp
- Page 177 and 178:
Economic Growth Case Comparisons
- Page 179 and 180:
Economic Growth Case Comparisons
- Page 181:
Economic Growth Case Comparisons
- Page 184 and 185:
Price Case Comparisons
- Page 186 and 187:
Price Case Comparisons
- Page 188 and 189:
Price Case Comparisons
- Page 190 and 191:
Price Case Comparisons
- Page 192 and 193:
Price Case Comparisons
- Page 194 and 195:
Appendix DResults from Side Cases
- Page 196 and 197:
Results from Side Cases
- Page 198 and 199:
Results from Side Cases
- Page 200 and 201:
Results from Side Cases
- Page 202 and 203:
Results from Side Cases
- Page 204 and 205:
Results from Side Cases
- Page 206 and 207:
Results from Side Cases
- Page 208 and 209:
Results from Side Cases
- Page 210 and 211:
NEMS Overview and Brief Description
- Page 212 and 213:
NEMS Overview and Brief Description
- Page 214 and 215:
NEMS Overview and Brief Description
- Page 216 and 217:
NEMS Overview and Brief Description
- Page 218 and 219:
NEMS Overview and Brief Description
- Page 220 and 221:
NEMS Overview and Brief Description
- Page 223 and 224:
Appendix FRegional MapsEnergy Infor
- Page 225 and 226:
Regional Maps Energy Information
- Page 227 and 228:
Regional Maps Energy Information Ad
- Page 229:
Regional MapsEnergy Information Adm
- Page 233:
The Energy Information Administrati