13.07.2015 Views

Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030 - Usinfo.org

Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030 - Usinfo.org

Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030 - Usinfo.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Issues in Focussynthesis gas. Any other elements contained in thebiomass are removed during the gasification step.The carbon monoxide and hydrogen are then reacted<strong>to</strong> form liquid hydrocarbons and water.Although BTL products are high in quality, BTLplants face several challenges. They have high capitaland operating costs, and their feeds<strong>to</strong>ck handlingcosts are especially high. BTL gasifiers are significantlymore expensive than the gasifiers used in CTLor GTL facilities. Furthermore, the cost of a BTLplant per barrel of output is several times the cost ofexpanding an existing petroleum refinery or buildinga new one. As a result, while new BTL plants arebeing built in Germany, there is no commercial productionof BTL in the United States. BTL productionand its market implications are discussed under“Nonconventional Liquid Fuels,” below.In another process, vegetable oils and animal fats canbe reacted <strong>with</strong> hydrogen <strong>to</strong> yield hydrocarbons thatblend readily in<strong>to</strong> diesel fuel. The oil or fat is pressurizedand combined in a reac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>with</strong> hydrogen in thepresence of a catalyst similar <strong>to</strong> those used in hydrotreatersat petroleum refineries. The products of theprocess are bioparaffins. Bioparaffin diesel fuel issimilar in quality <strong>to</strong> BTL diesel, <strong>with</strong> the added benefi<strong>to</strong>f being free of byproducts. The improvement inquality over methyl esters (biodiesel) is not free, however.A bioparaffin plant is less expensive than a BTLplant but more expensive than a biodiesel plant,because the bioparaffin reaction takes place underpressure, and a hydrogen plant is needed. Bioparaffinsalso share <strong>with</strong> biodiesel the problem offeeds<strong>to</strong>ck costs. Vegetable oils are expensive, especiallyif they are food grade. The catalyst needed alsoadds significant expense. The world’s first bioparaffinplant is being built at a petroleum refinery in Finland,but there are no plans for U.S. bioparaffin capacity atthis time.Ethanol. Ethanol can be blended in<strong>to</strong> gasoline readilyat up <strong>to</strong> 10 percent by volume. All cars and lighttrucks built for the U.S. market since the late 1970scan run on gasoline containing 10 percent ethanol.Au<strong>to</strong>makers also produce a limited number of vehiclesfor the U.S. market that can run on blends of up<strong>to</strong> 85 percent ethanol. Ethanol adds oxygen <strong>to</strong> the gasoline,which reduces carbon monoxide emissions fromvehicles <strong>with</strong> less sophisticated emissions controls. Italso dilutes sulfur and aromatic contents andimproves octane. Because newer vehicles <strong>with</strong> moresophisticated emissions controls show little or nochange in emissions <strong>with</strong> the addition of oxygen <strong>to</strong>gasoline, ethanol blending in the future will dependlargely on octane requirements, limits on gasolinesulfur and aromatics levels, and mandates for the useof renewable mo<strong>to</strong>r fuels.Ethanol production from starches and sugars, such ascorn, is a well-known technology that continues <strong>to</strong>evolve. In the United States, most fuel ethanol currentlyis distilled from corn, yielding byproducts thatare used as supplements in animal feed. Three fac<strong>to</strong>rsmay limit ethanol production from starchy and sugarycrops: all such crops are also used for food, andonly a limited fraction of the available supply could bediverted for fuel use <strong>with</strong>out driving up crop prices <strong>to</strong>the point where ethanol production would no longerbe economical; there is a limit <strong>to</strong> the amount of suitableland available for growing the feeds<strong>to</strong>ck crops;and only a portion of the plant material from thefeeds<strong>to</strong>ck can be used <strong>to</strong> produce ethanol. For example,corn grain can be used in ethanol plants, but thestalks, husks, and leaves are waste material, onlysome of which needs <strong>to</strong> be left on cornfields <strong>to</strong> preventerosion and replenish soil nutrients.The underutilization of crop residue has drivendecades of research in<strong>to</strong> ethanol production from cellulose;however, several obstacles continue <strong>to</strong> preventcommercialization of the process, including how <strong>to</strong>accelerate the hydrolysis reaction that breaks downcellulose fibers and what <strong>to</strong> do <strong>with</strong> the lignin byproduct.Research on acid hydrolysis and enzymatichydrolysis is ongoing. The favored proposal for dealing<strong>with</strong> the lignin is <strong>to</strong> use it as a fuel for CHP plants,which could provide both thermal energy and electricityfor cellulose ethanol plants, as well as electricityfor the grid; however, CHP plants are expensive.Currently, Canada’s Iogen Corporation is trying <strong>to</strong>commercialize an enzymatic hydrolysis technologyfor ethanol production. The company estimates that aplant <strong>with</strong> ethanol capacity of 50 million gallons peryear and lignin-fired CHP will cost about $300 million<strong>to</strong> build. By comparison, a corn ethanol plant <strong>with</strong> acapacity of 50 million gallons per year could be builtfor about $65 million, and the owners would not bearthe risk associated <strong>with</strong> a new technology. Co-locationof cellulose ethanol plants <strong>with</strong> existing coal-firedelectric power plants could reduce the capital cost ofthe ethanol plants but would also limit sitingpossibilities.Electricity ProductionSome of the electricity generating technologies andfuels represented in NEMS are currently uneconomical,and there are still other fossil, renewable, andnuclear options under development that are not<strong>Energy</strong> Information Administration / <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!