07.01.2013 Views

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The open channel is under the financial responsibility of the German-speaking Community<br />

while the management is the responsibility of a private-sector non-profit association.<br />

Program and program regulations. The BRF is responsible for information, education and<br />

entertainment of the audience. Additionally, it has the task to make the German-speaking<br />

Community known. The are standards of objectivity. The BRF's management board<br />

functions as a control structure having supervisory responsibility for the BRF. It strives for<br />

freedom of opinion for the various ideological and philosophical tendencies. According to<br />

the Media Decree, all television providers must ensure the visibility of the Germanspeaking<br />

Community in their programmes.<br />

Private radio broadcasters are obliged to present balanced information reflecting a<br />

multitude of perspectives in their programm. Furthermore, they have to put emphasis on<br />

culture and artists from the German-speaking Community and the neighbouring regions.<br />

Private individual and legal entities are able under their own responsibility to transmit<br />

television programming under certain time limitations. For this purpose, the German<br />

speaking Community has set up a public broadcasting channel under private sponsorship,<br />

Belgium offering free, equal access and free, equal use. Access is denied, inter alia, to<br />

political parties; sponsored contributions are not permitted. (ericarts Belgium 22f.)<br />

Conclusions: Diversity and Broadcasting in Belgium<br />

Broadcasting in Belgium is organized mainly according to the political entities of the<br />

communities and according to the principle of subsidiarity. As a result the system is open to<br />

diversity and even actively supports diversity of many kinds (propriety, contents,<br />

language).<br />

There is sparse direct information on the concrete situation of musical diversity in Belgium,<br />

but the structures outlined above indicate the cultural diversity in general is highly<br />

esteemed by the political organization of broadcasting in Belgium.<br />

That the organization of Belgium broadcasting system according to the devision in three<br />

main communities leads to an adequate representation of these groups in the broadcasting<br />

structures has been shown. A question still remaining open is, if the emphasis put on this<br />

distinction disfavours other distinctions such as the representation of other minorities. From<br />

the available information this does not seem to be the case. Although migrant workers, for<br />

example, do not have the status of one or more separate community, they are represented in<br />

the broadcasting program.<br />

EXAMPLE 3: BROADCASTING STRUCTURES IN GERMANY<br />

Political Competencies and Financing<br />

Broadcasting in Germany is mainly regulated by the federal states (Länder). The statutory<br />

basis for the public and the private sector is the Interstate Broadcasting Agreement<br />

concluded among the Länder. On the basis of this agreement and of their competencies for<br />

broadcasting, the Länder have enacted detailed provisions in their respective Land<br />

Broadcasting Acts. The legal framework for the new information and communications<br />

technologies is defined by the Telecommunications Act (August 1st, 1996), the Federal<br />

Information and Communication Services Act (August 1st, 1997), and the essentially<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!