07.01.2013 Views

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There is such diversity in Australian music that it is not easy to see the loss of a genre or<br />

two as a crisis. But perhaps we can identify some genres at risk.<br />

Western classical music is perhaps at the top of the list. The core audiences for classical<br />

music are those for the large ensembles – the orchestras and opera companies. These 18-<br />

19C entities now must live in a 21C economy and they are not suited to it. They cannot do<br />

without substantial subsidy, and in Australia that subsidy comes mainly from governments.<br />

In the end, the subsidy can be given only with the assent of the governed and the majority<br />

of tax payers prefer other, unsubsidised music. The situation is inherently precarious. The<br />

challenge is to persuade and maintain a majority of tax payers in the belief that music is<br />

good, classical music is good, and it is a good idea for the government to ensure its<br />

survival.<br />

The cultural underpinnings of traditional indigenous music<br />

weaken and so it must be<br />

supposed that the music is at risk. The attention, such as it is, of the broader community is<br />

on indigenous musicians’ activities in country and rock music. There seems to be some<br />

diversity of opinion among indigenous musicians about the value of the original traditions.<br />

The traditions that immigrants have<br />

brought with them are also a focus of public policy,<br />

again suggesting that survival and/or development is at risk. As with indigenous traditional<br />

music, these musics presumably are not supported in their new habitats in the same way<br />

that they were in their countries of origin. Public funding however is extremely modest, so<br />

their survival is not assured from that source.<br />

35. Bring to light those good practices and actions that need to be strengthened and<br />

widely practised in this field.<br />

Many good and important practices are in the hands of private individuals, organisations or<br />

companies. These practices can be encouraged, documented and publicised. Private<br />

initiatives are appreciated, but if there is to be any sort of concerted action to encourage<br />

them it must come mainly from government. And of course, governments also can act<br />

directly in pursuit of cultural objectives.<br />

The following suggestions therefore are mostly for action by governments.<br />

<strong>International</strong> Agreements<br />

Governments should ratify all international declarations, conventions and agreements that<br />

define and support human rights and cultural rights. See APPENDIX 1 for the statements<br />

about cultural rights in eight of these documents..<br />

Governments should ratify the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding<br />

of the Intangible<br />

Cultural Heritage and implement its provisions.<br />

Governments should ratify the UNESCO Convention for the Protection and Promotion of<br />

the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. They should use this Convention to support their<br />

cultural sovereignty in the face of pressures in international trade negotiations to abandon<br />

support for local cultures. Furthermore, they should respond to its various invocations to<br />

support cultural and therefore musical diversity within their borders and the free exchange<br />

of cultural expressions across borders.<br />

Governments should maintain cultural sovereignty in the negotiation of international trade<br />

agreements. As a rule, culture should not be included in these agreements. <strong>International</strong><br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!