07.01.2013 Views

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5 Copyright<br />

In 1996 WIPO adopted two treaties which aim at modernizing the national copyright laws<br />

in the light of new technical developments, such as the internet: the WIPO Copyright<br />

Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT). Both are<br />

concerned with in the protection intellectual property rights in the information society. In<br />

accordance with the WIPO treaties, the European Union passed the EU Directive<br />

2001/29/EC on intellectual property in 22 May 2001. The member states have to implement<br />

this directive. The EU directive accounts not only for EU states, but also for members of<br />

the European Economic Area (EEA).<br />

The following sections describe the implementation process and related discussion of the<br />

EU directive in two countries, Germany and France.<br />

EXAMPLE 1: GERMANY<br />

In Germany the First Law for the Regulation of Copyright in the Information Society<br />

became effective in September 2003. With this step, the so called "first basket", the<br />

legislator realized the imperative aspects of the EU directive. Other aspects of the EU<br />

directive that are not compelling for the member states were left for a second step, the so<br />

called "second basket". The federal Ministry of Justice presented a draft for the second<br />

basket in January 2006 and a slightly revised version was on the 22th March 2006.<br />

According to the relevant minister, the bill aims at a fair exchange of interests between<br />

creators, users, industry, cultural sector and science.<br />

Controversial aspects in the discussion of the amendment of the copyright are:<br />

6. copying for private use<br />

7. technical systems for copy protection and digital rights management<br />

(DRM)<br />

8. flatrate levies<br />

9. a new regulation of the so called unknown possibilities of use<br />

(unbekannte Nutzungsarten).<br />

10. the regulation of copyright for science and research<br />

The EU directive determines that the circumvention of technical protection mechanisms to<br />

create private copies is illegal. Through the "first basket" the German legislator has<br />

implemented this allegation by forbidding the circumvention of "effective technical<br />

measures" for the protection of a copyright protected works without the approval of right's<br />

owner (§95a Abs. 1 UrhG). The phonographic industry, especially the German section of<br />

IFPI e. V. and the Bundesverband der Phonographischen Wirtschaft e. V. demand more<br />

restrictions for the private copy in the "second basket". The German Ministry for Justice<br />

(BMJ) introduced a bagatelle clause (Bagatellklausel) according to which the private users<br />

are not prosecuted for violating the copyrights by making private copies. The ministry does<br />

not want a "criminalization of the school yards" was an argument in the public discussion.<br />

The association of the phonographic industry, however, demands a deletion of this clause<br />

and is supported by the Minister of State in the Federal Chancellery and Commissioner for<br />

Cultural and Media Affairs, Bernd Neumann (CDU). Thus, the bagatelle clause is a<br />

360

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!