07.01.2013 Views

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Inadequate and outdated copyright legislation, particularly with regard to<br />

needletime.<br />

• Widespread piracy and copyright infringement that disables the growth of the local<br />

music industry.<br />

• The ineffectiveness of the IBA's (now called ICASA – Independent<br />

Communications Authority of South Africa) local content monitoring system and<br />

the low levels of local content in the media.<br />

• The prevalence of unfair contracts - historic and current - leading to a polarised and<br />

hostile industrial relations environment.<br />

• A legacy of disempowerment and lack of access to education, training and<br />

information about the economics of the industry among musicians and related<br />

workers, coupled with a lack of transparency and accountability of key players<br />

within the industry.<br />

• An imbalance in power relations in the industry that negatively impacts on its<br />

growth - in particular, the inadequate definition of musicians’ status as workers in<br />

labour legislation which undermines their access to legal protection and other<br />

benefits 5 .<br />

• Widespread experience of ongoing racism and sexism within the industry.<br />

• The isolation of aspirant musicians living outside of Gauteng. (Note: Gauteng is<br />

South Africa’s economic heartland – the smallest but wealthiest of the nine<br />

provinces into which the country is divided.)<br />

• Inadequate funding for music development.”<br />

MITT’s recommendations then followed and are given under the relevant headings in<br />

Addendum 3, at the conclusion of this report.<br />

A very recent development, coming well after MITT’s recommendations, has been the<br />

establishment of AIRCO – the Association of Independent Record Companies. Their<br />

website is not yet even up and running, but they can be contacted via irfaan@chissa.co.za<br />

or asstel@worldonline.co.za. AIRCO’s focus is on local record companies whereas<br />

RISA (mentioned above) focuses on the multi-national record companies in South Africa,<br />

and the distribution of their music here locally.<br />

II.2 Informant Marianne Feenstra, under the second term of reference defined for this<br />

study, made the following two specific points, related firstly to an educational aspect, and<br />

secondly to tourism: “The curricula developed over the past 5 years have included<br />

development of the music industry as a prerogative, particularly up to NQF level 4<br />

(Grade 12)”. Also “Many ‘cultural villages’ now also include music groups that perform<br />

5 In an email to the author of this report, informant Mbiba noted “power relations could also include market<br />

monopoly by the multinational companies – in production and distribution of music. Distribution of SA<br />

music abroad and broadcasting of local music in our local stations have been an issue for independent<br />

record producers who are on the mercy of the multinational companies for mastering, packaging,<br />

warehousing and distribution. In as far as broadcasting is concerned, multinational companies are only<br />

interested in giving more play to international artists. In a way SA is being used as a market territory for<br />

international music. Monopoly in production and distribution also mean that revenues in the value chain are<br />

being leaked out the country through these multinational companies.<br />

441

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!