07.01.2013 Views

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

Appendix 6 - International Music Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Government provides a subsidy currently covering 20% of the expenditures to help the<br />

fund (ericarts, p.21).<br />

Recent Re-Allocation of Public Responsibilities<br />

Contributions by the citizens and their local communities are encouraged. Over the past<br />

years, the Federal Government, the federal states and the municipalities have increasingly<br />

handed over direct responsibility for running cultural facilities and programs. This<br />

organisational restructuring of the cultural sector is favoured by representatives of the<br />

business sector and other groups in society, provided it does not result in reduction of the<br />

state's financing. Institutional reforms now reflect a growing preference for new<br />

sponsorship models. Two strategies can be distinguished in this context: the partial<br />

liberation of cultural institutions from the confines of budgetary and public service law and<br />

from municipal and other administrative structures through choice of another legal form<br />

such as a limited liability company or a foundation and the transfer of tasks to institutions<br />

in civil society. (ericArts, p. 33)<br />

Problems of Statistics<br />

The municipalities, the Federal States and the Federal Government operate on the basis of<br />

different definitions of the term "culture". As a result, public cultural expenditure statistics<br />

often vary considerably. EU cultural statistics with yet differing definitions and the very<br />

broad UNESCO statistical framework add to these various definitions of cultural statistics.<br />

Furthermore, other state activities, for instance measures for job promotion affect the<br />

cultural sector, but are rarely included in the statistics for culture.<br />

Overall development of funds<br />

Cultural expenditure increased disproportionately in comparison to other areas of public<br />

expenditure in the 1970s and 1980s. In the 1990s , however, leaving the effects of<br />

unification aside public expenditure declined (Ericarts Germany p.30).<br />

EXAMPLE 4: LITHUANIA<br />

Promotion of creativity, i.e. of artists, has been an inportant policy issue. In the 1990s, a<br />

system of state support for artists (scholarships, grants, awards, etc.) was established along<br />

with other forms of financial and social aid. The Culture and Sports Support Fund<br />

(established in 1998) is one example of such a measure. Furthermore, a legal basis is being<br />

developed to address the status of artists (ERICarts).<br />

4. Lithuania has special regulations concerning social security for artists (e.g. payment of<br />

state pensions) and a tax exemption from personal income tax.<br />

5. Financing of third sector (non-governmental instituion) comes from a variety of<br />

sources. State funding is generally allocated upon expert evaluation of candidate<br />

projects or programs submitted for competition.<br />

357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!