You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BANDITS IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE<br />
unclear. Some speculation is possible from the information that he once<br />
belonged to the Praetorian Guard. Given his known criminal career, this<br />
may well be taken as an indication that he had received a dishonourable<br />
discharge. A soldier who had crossed the military authorities and who,<br />
having been cashiered, was living a hand to mouth existence, was certainly<br />
sufficiently motivated to undertake acts of revenge. At any rate, his public<br />
summoning of slaves to rise up for freedom betokens an open protest against<br />
the state and society on the grounds of perceived injustice. Maternus’ desertion<br />
may have been similarly motivated, though there is nowhere any sign<br />
that he made a point of calling slaves to freedom. There can be no doubt<br />
that, apart from deserters, his movement would also have been joined by<br />
runaway slaves, criminals and others who found themselves on the margin of<br />
society. However, whether he went out of his way to recruit such people<br />
remains a mystery. Again, Herodian’s tale of the storming of the prisons was<br />
probably an attempt to reinforce the impression that Maternus was driven<br />
by base motives.<br />
Though Herodian may very well have exaggerated what he wrote about<br />
it, there can be no doubt that the movement which Maternus stirred up<br />
grew to a considerable size. The information that officials soon no longer<br />
treated it as brigandage, but reclassified Maternus and his men as enemies<br />
of the state may also have a basis in fact. 143 Behind this distinction lay the<br />
known legal differentiation between hostes and <strong>latrones</strong>, which was determined<br />
not only by the status of the enemy concerned under international<br />
law but also on occasion by his military strength. 144 Herodian’s reference to<br />
the magnitude of the forces at Maternus’ disposal is confirmed by an inscription<br />
set up by the Italian district of Urvinum Mataurense in honour of its<br />
patron, C. Vesnius Vindex, military tribune of Legio VIII Augusta, during<br />
whose service, after it had been relieved from ‘the recent siege’, the legion<br />
was given the titles ‘faithful, constant, the emperor Commodus’ own’. 145<br />
A. Alföldy has convincingly put together the evidence to suggest that it was<br />
Maternus and his deserters who blockaded VIII Augusta in its main base at<br />
Strasbourg. 146 This not only confirms that Maternus had a significant number<br />
of men at his disposal, but also provides a geographical reference, localising<br />
one centre of unrest in Upper Germany.<br />
6 Maternus’ revolt: a forerunner of the Bagaudae?<br />
Herodian continues that Maternus’ movement finally overran large parts of<br />
Gaul and Spain. 147 This has provoked an influential proposal, since 1954<br />
closely associated with the name of E.A. Thompson though its basic thinking<br />
originates from Soviet historians. 148 This says that from the late second<br />
century economic and social need produced a constantly expanding potential<br />
for protest among the rural population of the Roman West. Maternus’ revolt,<br />
128