10.01.2013 Views

latrones - Get a Free Blog

latrones - Get a Free Blog

latrones - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BANDITS IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE<br />

purpose; but this is speculation. Tensions among those penned up inside are<br />

the inevitable consequence of any siege. In any case, Lydius’ victim went<br />

over to the Romans and offered to kill Lydius with a long distance shot. It<br />

worked: Lydius was hit as he leant out of a spy hole. 127 Severely wounded,<br />

he got his comrades to swear that they would hold out to the bitter end<br />

and then died. The besieged felt themselves in no way bound by their oath<br />

and gave themselves up immediately after his death. 128 As the driving force<br />

of the revolt Lydius appears to have possessed the personal magnetism of<br />

the charismatic leader. This is another variant of the theme of the leader<br />

as the brain and backbone of a political movement.<br />

The wider historical context of the revolt of Lydius and that of our next<br />

subject, Palfuerius, is well known thanks to the many stories about Isauria<br />

found in writers from Strabo to Ammianus Marcellinus and the author of<br />

the Historia Augusta. 129 Isauria was part of a wider area of constant political<br />

instability in southern Asia Minor. The region reacted to the ‘Crisis’ with<br />

manifestations of separatism. The imperial government found it increasingly<br />

difficult to control. In the fourth century, it was regarded virtually as part of<br />

Barbaricum. 130 As long as we can trust what we know about Lydius as being<br />

historically authentic, it exemplifies the instability of the area.<br />

Very close to Zosimus’ Lydius in time, location and circumstance is<br />

Palfuerius, an Isaurian ‘bandit’ of the time of Probus. 131 The similarities<br />

between these two men have led some to propose that they are one and the<br />

same person – the most recent advocate of this suggestion is J. Rougé. 132<br />

But Palfuerius figures in the Historia Augusta, not in Zosimus, and the two<br />

accounts differ from each other on significant points regarding geography<br />

and detail. Lydius occurred at the time of Probus’ Germanic wars. His<br />

original sphere of power lay in Lycia and Pamphylia. He was pursued by<br />

an anonymous Roman field commander. Palfuerius, on the other hand, was<br />

based in Isauria. The author of the Historia Augusta makes no mention of his<br />

taking refuge in Cremna. And he was hunted down and taken out by Probus<br />

himself, following the completion of the campaigns in the Rhineland. The<br />

number of significant discrepancies makes it therefore unlikely that Lydius<br />

and Palfuerius are the same person. 133<br />

That Probus is supposed to have taken on the task of combating Palfuerius<br />

in person is in itself a sign that the latter was no ordinary bandit but a selfdeclared<br />

local dynast. The emperor drew the attention of the population<br />

of Rome to his success in this war within the framework of gladiatorial<br />

shows that he staged on the occasion of his victories over the Germans and<br />

the Blemmyes. ‘Bandits’ captured in Isauria were among those compelled<br />

to appear in the arena. 134 With reference to the capture of Palfuerius, the<br />

writer of the ‘Life’ of Probus has the emperor remark that it is easier to keep<br />

brigands out of Isauria than to expel them from there. 135 He adds that, in a<br />

political measure designed to restrict local ‘banditry’, Probus gave land in<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!