Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LEADERS OF SLAVE REVOLTS AS LATRONES<br />
cheap tricks on the people of his acquaintance supposedly as proof of his<br />
supernatural powers, trying to persuade them that he was under the special<br />
protection of the ‘Syrian goddess’, i.e., Atargatis-Astarte, who had promised<br />
him kingship. 27 Eunous subsequently indeed became a king, of the slave<br />
rebels of Sicily, an office which, according to Diodorus, he held by virtue<br />
of neither his courage nor his warlike abilities, but rather because of the<br />
attention which he had drawn to his person, because it was he who had<br />
stimulated the rebellion and because of the hopeful expectations inspired by<br />
his name – ‘the Benevolent’ – among the repressed. 28 By means of carefully<br />
chosen forms of expressing his monarchy (such as a diadem, royal dress, a<br />
princely household and a luxurious lifestyle), by the assumption of the Seleucid<br />
royal name of Antiochus, rich in tradition, and through the designation of<br />
his ‘subjects’ as ‘Syrian’, Eunous gave his slave state the outward appearance<br />
of an Hellenistic monarchy, the power of which, without doubt, affected<br />
both its internal operation and the way in which it was received externally. 29<br />
It is clear that, at least by the time of Diodorus’ description of his capture,<br />
the slave king did not escape being labelled a latro because he was more<br />
respected than his comrade, Cleon. According to Diodorus, Eunous, the<br />
wonderworker and monarch, panicked and hid himself away in some hole.<br />
Run down in his lair, he was dragged out into the light of day in the<br />
company of four others: his cook, his chef, his masseur and his fool. 30 It was<br />
not that Eunous was better than a latro; rather, he was simply transferred<br />
to another category, that of the degenerate Hellenistic monarch, which in<br />
Roman eyes was just as despicable as that of ‘bandit’.<br />
4 Salvius and Athenion<br />
As in the first, so in the second slave war the leadership of the rebellion<br />
rested with two men. Salvius, 31 its commander-in-chief, is depicted straightforwardly<br />
as a second Eunous and thus as no latro. The similarities between<br />
the two start with the former’s skills in divination and his Hellenistic/<br />
oriental royal household, and extend, by way of his formal proclamation as<br />
king, to his assumption of a suggestive regal name, Tryphon. 32 Apart from<br />
the correspondence of their both having chosen Hellenistic royal names,<br />
Eunous and Salvius are also alike in respect of their original names. Eunous<br />
means ‘The Benevolent’ and Salvius has a positive connotation as ‘The<br />
Saviour’. As we have already seen, there is direct evidence that the slaves of<br />
the first revolt considered the name Eunous as favourable, portending a good<br />
ruler. We may therefore suppose that those of the second revolt were likewise<br />
ready to seize on various types of omens. They too may have perceived<br />
a lucky sign in ‘Salvius’, even though it was a common slave name, to which<br />
under normal circumstances no one would have attached any particular meaning.<br />
We do not know how Eunous came by his name. Similarly, we know<br />
nothing about who Salvius got his name from, or whether he exploited its<br />
61