You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IMPERIAL CHALLENGERS: BULLA FELIX AND MATERNUS<br />
extent of the Bellum Desertorum emerges as very wide indeed. Herodian’s<br />
reference, apropos the wide distribution of the trouble spots, to Gaul and<br />
Spain, seems more trustworthy; and the idea of some sort of link between<br />
Maternus and the Bagaudae receives significant confirmation since the evidence<br />
for destruction in north-west Gaul, most recently pointed up by Picard,<br />
fits in well with the notion of this area’s being the heart of the Bagaudic<br />
movement.<br />
Now this series of incidents, strung together to form a chain of evidence,<br />
may well indicate that a number of regions in the general area of Gaul and<br />
the Germanies suffered warlike incidents under Commodus, probably the<br />
result of military threat, political instability and social crisis (whether real<br />
or perceived). Maternus’ rebellion may, without doubt, be seen as manifestation<br />
of this last. However, there is no proof that all these trouble-spots were<br />
linked to the revolt; and, what is more, contemporary symptoms of crisis are<br />
certainly to be found even further afield in Gaul. To name just one example:<br />
around the time that Commodus succeeded Marcus Aurelius, Trier received<br />
its first city wall, still evidenced by its mighty North Gate, the ‘Porta<br />
Nigra’. 164 Since Trier had been granted colonial status under Augustus, the<br />
construction of this wall can hardly be explained symbolically – as marking<br />
the rank of colonia. And even if the wall was built close to the time of<br />
Maternus’ rising, without further evidence no one would dream of supposing<br />
that it was erected just because of it. It is more likely that ‘general<br />
unrest on the frontiers of the Rhine and Danube made the Treveri think it<br />
advisable to adorn their tribal capital with a circuit-wall’. 165 Contributory to<br />
this ‘general unrest’ were, no doubt, numerous smaller incidents on the lines<br />
of that of Maternus. Together with the new Germanic threat, they increased<br />
the severity of the coming overall ‘Crisis’ of the third century, of which they<br />
may be said to have been the harbingers. Thus it seems unlikely, and in<br />
any case unproven, that Maternus’ revolt grew to such a size that it extended<br />
from the upper Rhine to the far north-west of Gaul.<br />
The only link between Maternus and the Bagaudae is the three inscriptions<br />
of C. Iulius Septimius Castinus, each alike almost to the letter. 166 As<br />
commander of a detached force of men seconded from the four German<br />
legions, under the Severi, Castinus had directed operations ‘against renegades<br />
and rebels’ (adversus defectores et rebelles). Given the hundred years or so<br />
that separated Maternus and the Bagaudae, the unique evidence of this<br />
inscription should, from the start, be called upon as a link between the two<br />
only with great circumspection. That the renegades and rebels mentioned<br />
were insurgent provincials, deserters, runaway slaves and other marginal<br />
figures, who still consciously saw themselves as continuing a movement<br />
put down in 186, is not particularly plausible and anyway lacking in hard<br />
evidence. The suppression of a provincial uprising involving units from<br />
four legions would probably have found greater mention in the sources.<br />
On the other hand, the explanation that Castinus and his force proceeded<br />
131