OPEN SURGERY FOR REVASCULARIZATION OF THE DIABETIC FOOD ■ 93Table IVPrimary assisted patency in the surgicalgroup and in surgical group after failure of EVDISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONMultilevel arterial disease is best treatedby surgical bypass according to TASC recommendations.The ideal material for AK revascularizationsis synthetic, as it has given results similarto the autologous saphenous vein.Numerous reports have confirmed thelong-term superiority in patency of vein oversynthetic conduit, however, many physicianscontinue to use synthetic grafts in the AK positionto preserve venous conduit for a futuredistal revascularization.The choice of conduit was left to the discretionof the operating surgeon and is eitherePTFE or Dacron.The ideal material for BK revascularizationsis autologous saphenous vein, which hasbeen demonstrated to provide significantlybetter results than prosthetic grafts. When autologousveins are not suitable, the most commonlyused synthetic material is ePTFE associatedin particular situations to technical artificesfor distal anastomosis.Moreover, a significantly higher percentageof early graft thromboses and amputationswere recorded in patients undergoing redoprocedures and in patients with preoperativepoor runoff status. These findings support theneed for continuing to use autologous mate -rials in these subgroups of patients. The widespreaduse of venous material significantly in-fluenced the patency and the limb salvagerates,The EV appears to be a viable option forprimary SFA, particularly when vein is notavailable, if the patient is a poor candidate forconventional bypass, and in case of rest painor severe claudication.But in severe CLI patients, PTA has shownpoor long-term patency.TASC classifications needed to be correlatedto the clinical features to pone the correctindication to the treatment.Distal reconstructive arterial surgery,rather than becoming obsolete, has evolvedtoward more ambitious targets, pushing itslimits and being more distal, more extremeand more demanding for the treatment of tissueloss and gangrene.REFERENCES1. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, Johnston KW, Porter JM,Ahn S et al. Recommended standards for reports dealingwith lower extremity ischemia: Revised version. J Vasc Surg1997; 26:517-538.2. Kalra M, Gloviczki P, Bower TC, Pan<strong>net</strong>on JM, Harmsen WS,Jenkins GD et al. Limb salvage after successful pedal bypassgrafting is associated with improved long-term survival. JVasc Surg 2001; 33:6-16.3. Nguyen LL, Mo<strong>net</strong>a GL, Conte MS, Bandyk DF, Clowes AW,Seely BL. PREVENT III Investigators. Prospective multicenterstudy of quality of life before and after lower extremityvein bypass in 1404 patients with critical limb ischemia. JVasc Surg 2006; 44: 977-984.4. F Spinelli, G De Caridi, M La Spada et al.. By-pass on malleolarand pedal arteries. In A Stella, M Gargiulo: Arteriopatia diabeticaperiferica. Ed. Minerva Medica Torino 2009, pag 109-114.5. Andros G, Harris RW, Salles-Cunha SX, et al: Bypass graftsto the ankle and foot. J Vasc Surg 1988; 7:785-794.6. Belkin M, Welch HJ, Mackey WC, O’Donnell Jr TF: Clinicaland hemodynamic results of bypass to isolated tibial arterysegments for ischemic ulceration of the foot. Am JSurg 1992; 164:281-284.7. Faglia E, Dalla Paola L, Clerici G, et al: Peripheral angioplastyas the first-choice revascularization procedure in diabeticpatients with critical limb ischemia: prospective study of993 consecutive patients hospitalized and followed between1999 and 2003. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29:620-627.8. F Spinelli, F Stilo, M La Spada et al.. Results of femoro-distalbypass according to clinical conditions and prostheticmaterials. In C Pratesi, R Pulli: Up-date in ChirurgiaVascolare. Ed. Minerva Medica Torino 2007: 248-253.
94 ■ PIE DIABÉTICO9. F Spinelli, F Stilo, G De Caridi et al.. In G. Coppi: Diagnosticaavanzata e accessi vascolari. Ed. Minerva Medica Torino2011, pag 409-417.10. Kunlin J: Le traitement de l’arterite obliterante par le greffeveineuse. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1949; 42:371-372.11. Testart J: Jean Kunlin (1904-1991). Ann VascSurg 1995; 9(Suppl):S1-S6.12. Roll S, Müller-Nordhorn J, Keil T et al. Dacron vs. PTFE asbypass materials in peripheral vascular surgery systematicreview and meta-analysis. BMC Surg 2008;8:22.13. Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, Mannick JA: Further experiencewith an all-autogenous tissue policy for infrainguinalreconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18:41-48.14. Taylor Jr LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM: Present status ofreversed vein bypass grafting: five-year results of a modernseries. J Vasc Surg 1990; 11:193-205.15. Bagi P, Schroeder T, Sillesen H, Lorentzen JE: Real time B-mode mapping of the greater saphenous vein. Eur J VascSurg 1989; 3:103-105.16. F Spinelli, F Stilo, F Benedetto et al.. Femoro-poplitealbypass for CLI. In Goëau-Brissonière, Ricco, Koskas:Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2010. Critical LimbIschemia in 2010. Ed. GMSanté. Paris 2010, pag 26-36.17. Shah DM, Darling RC 3rd, Chang BB, et al. Long-termresults of in-situ saphenous vein bypass. Analysis of 2058cases. Ann Surg 1995;222:438-448.18. Leather RP, Shah DM, Chang BB et al. Resurrection of thein situ saphenous vein bypass, 1 000 cases later. Ann Surg1988;208:435-42.19. Belkin M, Knox J, Donaldson MC et al. Infrainguinal arterialreconstruction with nonreversed greater saphenous vein. JVasc Surg 1996;24:957-62.20. Batson RC, Sottiurai VS. Nonreversed and in situ vein grafts.Clinical and experimental observations. Ann Surg1985;201:771-9.21. Chang BB, Paty PS, Shah DM et al. The lesser saphenousvein: an underappreciated source of autogenous vein. J VascSurg. 1992;15:152-157.22. Londrey GL, Bosher LP, Brown PW et al. Infrainguinalreconstruction with arm vein, lesser saphenous vein andremnants of greater saphenous vein: a report of 257 cases.J Vasc Surg 1994;20:451-7.23. Spinelli F, Mirenda F, Mandolfino T et al. The lesser saphenousvein (LSV) for distal revascularizations for lowerlimbs salvage. J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001; 8:97-110.24. Arvela E, Söderström M, Albäck A et al. Arm vein conduit vsprosthetic graft in infrainguinal revascularization for criticalleg ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:616-23.25. Faries PL, LoGerfo FW, Arora S et al. A comparative studyof alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization:Allautogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts. J VascSurg 2000;32:1080-90.26. G. Carella, F Stilo, F Benedetto et al.. Femoro-distal bypasswith varicose veins covered by prosthetic mesh. J Surg Res2011. In press.27. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E et al. Six-year prospective multicenterrandomized comparison of autologous saphenousvein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts ininfrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg1986;3:104-14.28. Klinkert P, Post PN, Breslau PJ, van Bockel JH. Saphenousvein versus PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Areview of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2004;27:357-62.29. Berglund J, Björck M, Elfström J. SWEDVASC Femoro-poplitealStudy Group. Long-term results of above knee femoro-poplitealbypass depend on indication for surgery andgraft-material. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;29:412-8.30. Pereira CE, Albers M, Romiti M et al. Meta-analysis of femoropoplitealbypass grafts for lower extremity arterial insufficiency.J Vasc Surg 2006;44:510-7.31. Jackson MR, Belott TP, Dickason T et al. The consequencesof a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: comparison ofsaphenous vein and PTFE grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:498-505.32. Takagi H, Goto S, Matsui M et al. A contemporary metaanalysisof Dacron versus polytetrafluoroethylene graftsfor femoropopliteal bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg2010;52:232-6.33. Pulli R, Dorigo W, Castelli P et al. on behalf of the PropatenItalian Registry Group. Midterm results from a multicenterregistry on the treatment of infrainguinal critical limbischemia using a heparin-bonded ePTFE graft. J Vasc Surg2010;51:1167-77.34. Dardik H, Berry SM, Dardik A et al. Infrapopliteal prostheticgraft patency by use of the distal adjunctive arteriovenousfistula. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:685-90.35. Stonebridge PA, Prescott RJ, Ruckley CV. Randomized trialcomparing infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypassgrafting with and without vein interposition cuff at the distalanastomosis. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:543-50.36. Pan<strong>net</strong>on JM, Hollier LH, Hofer JM. Multicenter randomizedprospective trial comparing a pre-cuffed polytetrafluoroethylenegraft to a vein cuffed polytetrafluoroethylene graftfor infragenicular arterial bypass. Ann Vasc Surg.2004;18:199-206.37. Ascer E, Gennaro M Pollina RM et al. Complementary distalarteriovenous fistula and deep vein interposition: a fiveyearexperience with a new technique to improve infrapoplitealprosthetic bypass patency. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:134-43.38. Spinelli F, Mandolfino T, D’Alfonso M et al. Distal revascularisationof lower limbs using prosthetic bypass and venousinterposition fistula following the Ascer procedure. J VascEndovasc Surg 2001; 4: 285-289.39. Sogaro F, Galeazzi E, Amroch D et al. Pantaloon vein grafttechnique in tibial revascularization with arteriovenous fistulafor limb salvage. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;4:377-80.40. Ysa A, Bustabad MR, Arruabarrena A et al. Easy alternativesto difficult clamping of distal vessels of the leg. J Vasc Surg2008;47:1091-3.41. Spinelli F, Stilo F. Regarding: «Easy alternatives to difficultclamping of distal vessels of the leg». J Vasc Surg.2008;48:1641-1642.42. Fahner PJ, Mirza M, van Gulik T et al. Systematic review ofpreservation methods and clinical outcome of infrainguinalvascular allografts. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:518-24.43. Tolva V, Bertoni GB, Trimarchi S et al. Unreliability of depopulatedbovine ureteric xenograft for infra inguinal bypass