Le discours de la francophonie

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Adriana Teodorescu – New Technologies, New Worlds…Although it has been often argued that CMC promotes isolationand remoteness, computer-mediated communication toolssuch as emails, blogs, social networking, IM, etc., have proved toenhance and sustain interpersonal communication, by increasinginformation exchange, developing relationships and interculturalcommunication, and promoting knowledge spread. People notonly socialize online, but they also incorporate CMC tools in theirpractices, as an instrument of information search in both theirprofessional and private life. The profile of the Romanian netizenis continuously changing, as he has become more and more receptiveto social stimuli and more interested in sharing and accessingknowledge.ReferencesBARON, Naomi S., 1984, “Computer mediated communication as a force inlanguage change”, in Visible Language, XVIII 2, pp.118-141.BURGESS, A., JACKSON, T., EDWARDS, J., 2005, “Email training significantlyreduces email defects”, in International Journal of Information Management,25(1), pp.71-83.CRYSTAL, David, 2001, Language and the Internet, Cambridge UniversityPress.FERRARA, K., BRUNNER, H., WHITTEMORE, G., 1991, “Interactive writtendiscourse as an emergent register”, in Written Communication, 8(1), pp.8-34.HERRING, Susan C., 1996, Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic,Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Pragmatics and Beyond series,John Benjamins, Amsterdam.HERRING, Susan C, “Computer-mediated discourse”, in D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen,H. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, BlackwellPublishers, Oxford, 2001, pp. 612-634.HERRING, Susan C., SCHEIDT, L. A., BONUS, S., WRIGHT, E., 2004, “Bridgingthe gap: A genre analysis of weblogs”, in Proceedings of the 37th AnnualHawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04),IEEE Press, Los Alamitos.HERRING, Susan C., KOUPER, I., SCHEIDT, L. A., WRIGHT, E. L., 2004,“Women and children last: The discursive construction of weblogs”, in L.Gurak, S. Antonijevic, L. Johnson, C. Ratliff, J. Reyman (eds.), Into theBlogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs, University ofMinnesota, Minneapolis.KIM, H., KIM, G. J., PARK, H. W., RICE, R. E., 2007, “Configurations of relationshipsin different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone,139
Adriana Teodorescu – New Technologies, New Worlds…and SMS”, in Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4). Onlineat http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/kim.html.KRAUT, R. E., STREETER, L.A., 1995, “Coordination in software development,”in Communication of the ACM, 38 (3), pp. 69-81.MURRAY, Denise E., 1985, “Composition as conversation: The computer terminalas medium of communication”, in L. Odell & D. Goswami (eds.),Writing in Nonacademic Settings, Guilford, New York, pp. 203-227.NAUGHTON, J., 1999, A brief history of the future: the origins of the Internet,Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.POLLARD, Dave, 2003, Is the blogosphere sexist? How to Save the World[blog]. Retrieved April 2, 2012, from http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2003/10/30/is-the-blogosphere-sexist/.SEVERINSON EKLUNDH, K., 1986, Dialogue Processes in Computer-MediatedCommunication: A Study of Letters in the COM System, LinköpingStudies in Arts and Sciences, University of Linköping.SHANNON, C.E, WEAVER, W., 1949, The mathematical theory of communication,University of Illinois Press, Urbana.WEBER, R., 2004, “The grim reaper: The curse of email”, in MIS Quarterly,28, III–XIII.E-sources:http://www.radicati.comhttp://www.radicati.comhttp://www.internetworldstats.comhttp://www.zelist.rohttp://www.trafic.rohttp://www.liwc.nethttp://jcmc.indiana.edu140
Page 2 and 3:
La revue semestrielle ANADISS est l
Page 5 and 6:
Table des matières / Table of cont
Page 7 and 8:
Sanda-Maria Ardeleanu - Présentati
Page 9 and 10:
Sanda-Maria Ardeleanu - Présentati
Page 11 and 12:
Laura A.-Popovici & Ionela G.-Bând
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Les significations de la manipulati
Page 22 and 23:
Alina Broască - Les significations
Page 24 and 25:
Alina Broască - Les significations
Page 26 and 27:
Stratégies didactiques interactive
Page 28:
Mariana Chiriţă - Stratégies did
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Viorica Condrat - Les particularit
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Oana Coşman - Investigating specia
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Aspects de la communication oraleda
Page 63 and 64:
Maria Dolhăscu-Alexandriuc - Aspec
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Tiberiu I. Gafencu - Le discours pu
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Elena Gheorghiţă - Think aloud pr
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88: Elena Gheorghiţă - Think aloud pr
Page 95 and 96: Adriana-Nicoleta Iftinchi-Crăciun
Page 107 and 108: Le discours du récit journalistiqu
Page 109 and 110: Petru Ioan Marian - Le discours du
Page 117 and 118: Le discours de la francophonieCrist
Page 119 and 120: Cristina Obreja - Le discours de la
Page 121 and 122: New Technologies, New Worlds -Curre
Page 123 and 124: Adriana Teodorescu - New Technologi
Page 137: Adriana Teodorescu - New Technologi
Page 141 and 142: Georgiana Tofan - Formes de l’uti
Page 157 and 158: Identification and Identityof the C
Page 159 and 160: Mărioara Vlioncu - Identification
Page 181 and 182: COMPTES RENDUSBOOK REVIEWSDe la cr
Page 183 and 184: Comptes rendus / Book Reviews3. Org
Page 185 and 186: Comptes rendus / Book Reviewsplus a
Page 187 and 188: Comptes rendus / Book ReviewsÀ la
Page 189 and 190:
Stages de perfectionnement académi
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197:
show all

Le discours de la francophonie

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?