22.10.2014 Views

Multilinguismo, CLIL e innovazione didattica - Libera Università di ...

Multilinguismo, CLIL e innovazione didattica - Libera Università di ...

Multilinguismo, CLIL e innovazione didattica - Libera Università di ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Presenting presentations<br />

au<strong>di</strong>ence finally gave up on this attempt. It is hoped that by teaching university<br />

students the necessary skills to give good presentations then they will not<br />

have problems in the future when they are called upon to present a project or<br />

course.<br />

2. Literature review<br />

Widdowson (2003: 173) states that “in language teaching and testing our focus<br />

of attention should be on the language as a resource of making meaning”. This<br />

encourages us as practitioners to recall that the learners we are accompanying<br />

on their language learning pathway need the language because they need to<br />

make ‘meaning’; they need to communicate ideas. One setting which encourages<br />

students to concentrate on their meaning is the field of oral presentations.<br />

As language teachers we should not be spen<strong>di</strong>ng all our time teaching<br />

the ru<strong>di</strong>ments of grammar (although this is important) because as, again,<br />

Widdowson (2003: 174) says, “there is more to linguistic competence than a<br />

knowledge of grammar, and more to language capability than linguistic<br />

competence”. The second part of this again leads us into thinking that the<br />

learners need to be capable users and in courses they need to be able to have<br />

the chance to demonstrate that they are capable. This can be done in an oral<br />

presentation.<br />

There is a growing literature concerning oral presentations. Atkinson (2008),<br />

Duarte (2008, 2010), Etherington (2009), Reynolds (2008, 2010, 2011) and<br />

Williams (2010) all <strong>di</strong>scuss how to design good presentations with or without<br />

PowerPoint (PowerPoint is used here to refer to any of the slide software<br />

programs available such as Keynote). Very often the main concern can be<br />

summed up using Reynolds’ words ‘simplicity’, ‘naturalness’ and ‘elegance’<br />

(2008: 107).<br />

Harrington and LeBeau (2009: 5) <strong>di</strong>vide a presentation into three parts: the<br />

physical, the visual and the story. They justify this <strong>di</strong>vision by declaring: ”Not<br />

all communication in a speech comes from words. The way you stand, where<br />

you look, how you use your hands and vary your voice send a message as<br />

well” so there is a physical part; “Speech is not just about what you say. What<br />

261

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!