25.03.2013 Views

Narcissus and Daffodil

Narcissus and Daffodil

Narcissus and Daffodil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

374 K. Ingkaninan, H. Irth <strong>and</strong> R. Verpoorte<br />

Figure 15.3 The spectra <strong>and</strong> the chromatograms obtained after injection of the fraction<br />

from narcissus ‘Carlton’ extract into the on-line HPLC-UV-MS-bioactivity<br />

detection system. Left: ESI-MS. Right: Chromatograms from the biochemical<br />

detection set at 405 nm (upper line) <strong>and</strong> from the UV set at 215 nm<br />

(lower line). The delay time of the peaks between the biochemical detection<br />

<strong>and</strong> the UV was 2.3 ± 0.1 min <strong>and</strong> the delay time of the peaks between<br />

the biochemical detector <strong>and</strong> the MS was 2.1 ± 0.1 min.<br />

However, MS showed that there was another molecule present in the same peak at<br />

[M + H] of 290. It would be interesting to identify this compound further <strong>and</strong> test<br />

it for inhibitory effect. The minor peak in the chromatogram detected by the biochemical<br />

detector was caused by an unknown AChE inhibitor. Further studies<br />

should, therefore, focus on the isolation <strong>and</strong> identification of this active compound.<br />

A second example is a study of the extract from narcissus ‘Sir Winston Churchill’<br />

(Ingkaninan et al., 2000b). From the microplate assay, this extract showed much<br />

less activity than that of narcissus ‘Carlton’ (Figure 15.1). The extract was fractionated<br />

by the same CPC procedure as that of narcissus ‘Carlton’. The active fraction<br />

was also obtained at the same retention. However, when the active fraction was<br />

injected into the on-line system, no activity corresponding to galanthamine was<br />

found. The activity was from another compound with a different molecular weight<br />

<strong>and</strong> retention time. As this extract possibly contains new AChE inhibitors, it was<br />

chosen for further investigation. The active fraction was further separated by<br />

another CPC run <strong>and</strong> the fractions obtained were injected into the on-line system<br />

(Figure 15.4).<br />

The active peak from the biochemical detector at 15.2 min corresponded to the<br />

UV peak at 12.9 min <strong>and</strong> the MS peak at 13.1 min. However, MS spectra showed<br />

that there were two compounds present at 13.1 min having molecular weights of<br />

265 ([M + H] of 266) <strong>and</strong> 317 ([M + H] of 318). These two compounds were<br />

isolated by preparative HPLC <strong>and</strong> tested for AChE inhibitory activity by the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!