02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE GROWTH OF EQUITY. 57<br />

said to form part of it." 1 " When a general usage has been judicially<br />

ascertained and established," says Lord Campbell in Brandao v. Barnett*<br />

" it becomes a part of the law merchant, which Courts of justice are bound<br />

to know and recognise."<br />

Out of these discordant elements arose our common law.<br />

And side by side with it grew up its younger sister, equity.<br />

At. the close of the thirteenth century the three superior<br />

Courts of common law were firmly established at Westminster<br />

and busily engaged in disposing of all ordinary causes of<br />

action. But the King was still regarded as the fountain of<br />

justice. In him and his council there yet resided jurisdiction<br />

to redress any wrongs with which the ordinary Courts were<br />

powerless to deal. Hence, whenever a private individual<br />

suffered a grievance for which no remedy or no adequate<br />

remedy existed at common law, he was wont to petition the<br />

King in Council for redress. The King usually referred such<br />

petitions to his Chancellor. This officer was at first an<br />

ecclesiastic ; he was always, whether lay or ecclesiastical,<br />

the most learned man of the King's Council, and had the<br />

custody of the King's great seal; he eventually came to<br />

be "the keeper of the King's conscience." In the four-<br />

teenth century it became" the rule for petitioners to address<br />

themselves directly to the Chancellor, 3 and to beg his<br />

assistance " for the love of God and in the way of charity."<br />

Then, when trusts of land became common, the <strong>Law</strong><br />

Courts recognised only the legal owner and afforded no<br />

remedy for any breach of trust which he might commit<br />

by appropriating to his own use the profits of the land. Xo<br />

writ in consimili casu and no legal fiction could be devised to<br />

punish such a breach of confidence. So the beneficiaries<br />

naturally turned for aid to the new jurisdiction of the<br />

Chancellor. He, with the general approval of lawyers and<br />

laity alike, began to enforce by summary process the duty<br />

that lay upon the conscience of a trustee. Towards the<br />

end of the reign of Henry VIII. the Chancellor became<br />

i Per cur. in Goodwin v. Robarti (1876), L. R. 10 Ex. at p. 346.<br />

a (1846), 12 CI. & F. at p. 805.<br />

8 See an Ordinance passed in 22 Edw. III.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!