02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NATURAL RIGHTS.<br />

587"<br />

sufficiency of pasture for his beasts. Any act that totally destroys the<br />

herbage, as feeding innumerable rabbits on a common, will support an action<br />

against the lord. 1<br />

If a commoner sue for a nuisance to the common (e.g., where the defen-<br />

dant has dug a pit in the common), he must prove that his enjoyment of<br />

his right of common has thereby been appreciably impaired, as otherwise<br />

he has no cause of action. 2<br />

So an action will lie by a commoner against a stranger for putting his<br />

cattle on the common and thus preventing him from enjoying his right to<br />

the full. In such an action the defendant pleaded a licence from the lord<br />

to put his cattle there, but he did not aver that there was sufficient common<br />

left for the commoners ; this was held to be no good plea, for the lord<br />

had no right to give a stranger such a licence unless there was enough<br />

common left for the commoners. 8<br />

The lord of a manor by deed leased the right to train and gallop horses<br />

on the waste of the manor. It was held that he would not be liable for<br />

damage done to the rights of common of pasturage of the copyholders by<br />

the lessee, unless it was proved that the lessee caused the damage as the<br />

lord's agent or with his licence ; and that the mere fact that the lord had<br />

given such a licence did not of necessity involve injury to the right of the<br />

commoners to pasture their cattle thereon. 4<br />

V. Natural Rights.<br />

There are other rights attached to the occupation or<br />

ownership of land which do not depend in any way upon a<br />

grant express or implied or upon any long-continued user,<br />

but are incident to the property in the land. These are<br />

called "natural rights;" they are in fact involved in the<br />

conception of ownership, they are fragments of dominion.<br />

Chief among them are the right of support to land in its<br />

natural condition and the right to the flow of a stream down<br />

its natural watercourse.<br />

(a) Right of Support.<br />

Every owner of land has a natural right to the support of<br />

the subjacent soil and also of the adjacent land. Any person<br />

i Wells v Watlinq (1778), 2 W. Bl. 1233.<br />

. p/r Lord HoIt/dX in Ashby v. White (1703) 1 Sm L C 12th ed., at<br />

n 289 Robert Maw's Case (1612), 9 Rep. Ill b, 113 a Co. Litt. 56 a.<br />

;<br />

P '<br />

i Smithy Feverel (1675), 2 Mod. 6 ; 1 Freeman's B. 190 Greenhaw v. Ilsley<br />

;<br />

(1746), Willes, 619.<br />

*<br />

i Coote v. Ford (1900), 83 L. T. 482.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!