02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CRIMINAL ACT, CAUSING DEATH. 289<br />

is guilty of manslaughter under the next section of this<br />

chapter ; for he has acted with criminal negligence. But, in<br />

the class of cases which we are now discussing, it is enough<br />

that the act which the prisoner does is criminal in itself<br />

—<br />

i.e. T<br />

that it would be a crime even if no fatal results had followed.<br />

A man who does such an act must take the risks of all its<br />

consequences, and if fatal results do follow he is guilty of<br />

manslaughter, although there was no criminal negligence on<br />

his part and no intention in his mind to kill any one. The<br />

facts that the prisoner's act was not in ordinary circumstances<br />

likely to cause death, or that it was only by accident that<br />

death resulted in the particular case, are immaterial if the act<br />

which the prisoner intended to do was in itself a crime.<br />

Thus, if A. is a member of an unlawful assembly or of a mob of rioters<br />

and does some act in furtherance of their common unlawful purpose which<br />

accidentally causes the death of an unoffending by-stander, he is guilty of<br />

manslaughter. 1<br />

Where A. strikes B. intentionally and without any sufficient excuse,<br />

meaning only to inflict some trifling and temporary pain (as in a prize-<br />

fight 2 or in an unlawful game 3 ), and death unexpecoedly results, A. is guilty<br />

of manslaughter, for he intended to commit a battery, and a battery is a.<br />

crime.<br />

If A., finding a trespasser upon his land, beats and thus chances to kilt<br />

him he is guilty of manslaughter ; or if there be circumstances evidencing<br />

malice, he may be convicted of murder. This is so even though the<br />

trespasser has come on A.'s land with a felonious intention, provided he<br />

has not yet carried it into effect. But if the trespasser was in the act of<br />

breaking into A.'s house or of attacking any of the inmates, A.'s act would<br />

be held justifiable at law. 4<br />

It is a crime at common law kuowingly to send to market for human<br />

consumption meat which is unfit for that purpose, and by statute whether<br />

the sender knows it to be so or not. 5 If death results from such an act,,<br />

there will be ground for an indictment for manslaughter. 6<br />

If death be caused unintentionally by an unlawful act<br />

which is merely a tort and not a crime, the prisoner cannot<br />

1 R. v. McNaughten (1881), 14 Cox, 576.<br />

* B. v. Billingham (1825), 2 C. & P. 234 ; B. v. Perkins (1831), 4 C. & P.<br />

537 ; B. v. Coney and otters (1882), 8 Q. B. D. 534.<br />

8 B. v. Bradshaw (1878), 14 Cox, 83. An unlawful act in a lawful game lenders<br />

the game unlawful.<br />

4 See post, pp.299, 300.<br />

5 See 35 & 36 Vict. c. 74, s. 2, and Fitzpatrick v. Kelly (1873), L. E. 8 Q. B. 337.<br />

« B. v. Stevenson (1862), 3 F. & F. 106 ; B. v. Jarvis, lb. 108 ; B. v. Crawley,<br />

lb. 109 ; B. v. Kempson (1893), 28 L. J. (Newspaper) 477.<br />

B.C.L. 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!