02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

178 ACTS CALCULATED TO PROVOKE A BREACH Of THE PEACE.<br />

such evidence was regarded as an aggravation of the original<br />

offence.<br />

The Legislature, however, in the year 1843 came to the<br />

conclusion that in certain circumstances and with certain<br />

safeguards the defendant might be allowed to show in his<br />

defence the truth of the charges which he had made. By<br />

section 6 of Lord Campbell's Libel Act, 1843, 1 a defendant is<br />

now permitted to plead that his words are true, provided he<br />

also alleges that it was for the public benefit that his words<br />

were published, and sets out the facts which made their<br />

publication a benefit to the public. If a plea of this kind is<br />

pleaded, the defendant will be entitled to give evidence of<br />

the truth of his charges against the prosecutor; but such<br />

evidence will not amount to a defence to. the indictment,<br />

unless it was for the public benefit that such charges should<br />

be made public. The defendant must prove every one of<br />

his charges substantially true ;' if some of them prove to be false,<br />

judgment will go against him, although he may have proved<br />

the truth of others ; nor will it avail him that he honestly<br />

believed them all to be true. 2 Where prima facie evidence<br />

is given in proof of the justification, the onus will then be on<br />

the prosecutor to disprove it, and his not calling witnesses,<br />

whom he must be in a position to call and who will be friendly<br />

to him, will be strong evidence against him. 3<br />

If, however,<br />

the defendant is ultimately convicted, the Court will consider<br />

whether his guilt is aggravated or mitigated by his plea<br />

of truth, and by the evidence given to prove or disprove the<br />

same, and may increase or diminish the amount of the sentence<br />

accordingly.<br />

Other instances were discovered in which the criminal law<br />

treated individuals who were really innocent with a severity<br />

greater than the interests of the public required. Thus it<br />

was the rule in both civil and criminal proceedings—and a<br />

good and wholesome rule—that a master is liable for all acts<br />

of his servant done in the ordinary course of that servant's<br />

1 6 & 7 Vict. c. 96. See-indictment and plea, Nos. 10 and 10a, in the Appendix<br />

2 See It. v. Xeionvui (1853), 1 E, & B. at p. 573.<br />

3 R. v. ZabouoJiere (1880), 14 CnK 419.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!