02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

126 THE ELEMENTS OF A CRIME.<br />

For the same reason no infant under seven years of age can<br />

commit a crime. The law also presumes that an infant above<br />

seven but under fourteen years is incapable of committing a<br />

crime, for he has not yet acquired sufficient discretion to<br />

know right from wrong. This presumption, however, may<br />

be rebutted (except in the case of rape and offences involving<br />

carnal knowledge) by evidence that the infant knew what<br />

he was doing, and understood the wrongful nature of his<br />

act. 1<br />

„ No lunatic will be punished if he does not know what he is<br />

doing, or does not know that what he is doing is wrong. If<br />

he knows both what he is doing and that he ought not to do<br />

it, he is liable, although his desire to do it may be prompted<br />

by some delusion ; for his motive is, as a rule, immaterial so<br />

far as guilt or innocence is concerned. But he will not be<br />

liable where the delusion is of such a kind that, if the facts<br />

were as he supposed, his act would be justifiable. Again, as<br />

insanity may affect the will as well as the judgment, it is<br />

possible that a crime may be committed under the influence<br />

of some uncontrollable impulse : this, if proved, would be a<br />

defence. But it is very difficult to establish this defence to<br />

the satisfaction of the Court. 2 Mere irresistible impulse to<br />

do wrong affords no exception, if the intellectual faculties<br />

are in such a state that the offender knows he is doing<br />

wrong.<br />

Duress or compulsion is a defence to all save the gravest<br />

crimes. There are two forms of duress— physical and moral<br />

This distinction can best be explained by two instances. If<br />

A. seizes the hand of B., in which there is a knife, and by<br />

physical force compels B. to stabC, B. will not be guilty of<br />

murder, for he cannot help doing what he does ; the stabbing,<br />

indeed, is A.'s act and not B.'s. Here the compulsion is<br />

physical. But if A. threatens to kill or injure B. unless<br />

he stabs C, and B. under such moral compulsion does<br />

stab C, he will be guilty of murder; for he could and<br />

ought to have refused to stab C, although at the risk of his<br />

1 See poet, Book VI:, Chap. II., Infants.<br />

2 See post, Book VI., Chap. III., Lunatics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!