02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTENTIONAL MANSLAUGHTER. 287<br />

though it will not amount to murder<br />

;<br />

1<br />

if, therefore, the officer had no<br />

right to arrest B., killing him is at most manslaughter. But the illegal<br />

arrest of B., though a provocation to him, is in law no provocation to a<br />

friendly by-stander ; hence if such by-stander were to kill the officer, his<br />

act would be murder.<br />

Although the provocation- may be prima facie sufficient to<br />

reduce the homicide from murder to manslaughter, yet if the<br />

retaliation be not immediate, the prisoner may still be found<br />

guilty of murder. If a person receives a blow and avenges it<br />

at once with any instrument which he may happen to have in<br />

his hand, then the offence will be only manslaughter, provided<br />

the fatal blow is the result of anger arising from the previous<br />

provocation. But if there was sufficient time between the<br />

provocation and the fatal blow for the prisoner to regain his<br />

self-control, or if his conduct in the interval shows method<br />

and deliberation, the crime will remain murder. "The<br />

circumstances of the case rebut the inference of malice, if they<br />

show that the blow was given in the heat of passion arising<br />

on a sudden provocation, and before the passion had time to<br />

cool." 2 But if the passion has had time to cool, it is as<br />

though no provocation had ever been offered.<br />

Again, if there be evidence of express malice, the killing<br />

may be found murder, however great the provocation. In<br />

every case the question is : Was the prisoner deprived of his<br />

self-control ? In answering that question the jury must have<br />

regard to all the circumstances of the case. 3<br />

If, for instance,<br />

the prisoner himself contrived to bring about the provocation,<br />

he cannot rely upon it as a defence ;<br />

indeed, the manufacture<br />

of such a provocation is in itself evidence of malice afore-<br />

thought, as it shows a deliberate intention to kill.<br />

If A. and B. are fighting with fists and B., who is getting the worst of<br />

it, takes up a knife which happens to be lying on a table close by, and<br />

stabs A., this will be manslaughter only, because the knife was lifted in the<br />

heat of the moment. But if B., after getting the worst of the fight, left<br />

the room and went to his own house and fetched a knife, and then returned<br />

and stabbed A., this would be murder ; for B. had time to regain his self-<br />

1 B. v. Carey (1878), 14 Cox, 214.<br />

2 Per Brie, C. J., in R. v. Eagle (1862), 2 F. & F. at p. 830.<br />

8 See ante, p. 2*5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!