02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE. 533<br />

such acts in the London Gazette, to all State papers, and to<br />

all advice given to the Crown by its ministers or ambassadors. 1<br />

Qualified Privilege.<br />

Occasions of qualified privilege, i.e., privilege which can<br />

he rebutted by proof of actual malice, may be grouped under<br />

two heads :<br />

—<br />

I. Privilege arising from Duty or Interest.<br />

II. Privileged Eeports.<br />

Privilege arising from Duty or Interest.<br />

The guiding principle, by which such privileged occasions<br />

may be ascertained, has been laid down as follows ;— " A<br />

communication made bond fide upon any subject-matter, in<br />

which the party communicating has an interest or in reference<br />

to which he has a duty, is privileged, if made to a person<br />

having a corresponding interest or duty. And the word<br />

' duty ' cannot be confined to legal duties, which may be<br />

enforced by indictment, action or mandamus, but must<br />

include moral and social duties of imperfect obligation." 2<br />

Both the person making the communication and the person<br />

receiving it must have either an interest in the subject-<br />

matter of the communication, or some duty to discharge in<br />

connection with it.<br />

Let us apply this rule to special cases :<br />

(i.) Answers to Confidential Inquiries.— " If a person who is<br />

thinking of dealing with another in any matter of business<br />

asks a question about his character from some one who has<br />

means of knowledge, it is for the interests of society that the<br />

and the answer is a privileged<br />

question should be answered ;<br />

communication." 3<br />

The commonest instance of this is the " character " of a servant given<br />

by a former master to some one with whom the servant is seeking employ-<br />

ment. Such a communication is held privileged, because it is for the<br />

1 DawMns v. Lord Iiokeby. supra; Grant v. Secretary of State for India ,(1877)<br />

2 0. P. D. 445 ; Att.-Ben. of the Cape of QdoA Hope v. Van Reenen, [1904] A. 0.<br />

114 ; and see Adam v. Ward, [1917] A. C. 309.<br />

8 Per Lord Campbell, 0. J., in Harriton v. Buth (1855), 5 E. & B. at pp. 348,<br />

349.<br />

8 Per Brett, L. J., in Waller v. Loch (1881), 7 Q. B. D. at p. 622.<br />

—<br />

,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!