02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRIVATE NUISANCES. 505<br />

innocently and resold the article in the state in which he<br />

received it.<br />

There are numerous other instances of acts endangering<br />

the public health ; and if damage ensues to a particular<br />

individual over and above that sustained by every member of<br />

the public, he will have a good cause of action. Thus, if a<br />

man caught an infectious disease through another breaking<br />

quarantine, or through the failure of a cabman to disinfect<br />

his cab after taking a smallpox case to the hospital, he could<br />

sue for damages.<br />

Private Nuisances.<br />

Any act which, if it affected many persons, would be a<br />

public nuisance is a private nuisance when it affects only<br />

one or two. The distinction turns on the extent of the<br />

injury. It does not follow, because a thing complained of is a<br />

nuisance to several individuals, that it is therefore a public<br />

nuisance. For instance, the obstruction of a right of light or<br />

other easement is now regarded as a private nuisance, 1<br />

and if<br />

a man by building up a wall darkens the ancient windows of<br />

several different dwelling-houses, he is not therefore guilty of<br />

a public nuisance. Again, a peal of bells is no nuisance or<br />

inconvenience whatever, but is even pleasant, to those who<br />

are at a distance from it. Hence it cannot be a public<br />

nuisance. But it may be a private nuisance to those who live<br />

close to the church, if the bells be rung at unreasonable<br />

hours. 2<br />

Any act, then, other than a direct physical interference, 3 or<br />

any omission to discharge a legal duty, which materially<br />

impairs the use and enjoyment of a man's property or prejudi-<br />

cially affects his health, comfort or convenience, is a private<br />

nuisance, for which he can claim damages in an action of tort.<br />

"Whether a nuisance exists or not in any particular case is a<br />

question of fact for the jury, subject of course to the direction<br />

1 See Colls v. Home and Colonial Stores, [1904] A. C. 179. This subject is dealt<br />

with post, p. 571.<br />

2 Soltauv. Dt Held (1851), 2 Sim. X. S. 133.<br />

s Any direct physical interference with a man's land, goods or person would be a<br />

trespass :<br />

ante, pp. 445, 458, 470.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!