02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter X.<br />

CONSPIRACY.<br />

A conspiracy is an agreement by two or more persons<br />

to carry out an unlawful common purpose or to carry out a<br />

lawful common purpose by unlawful means. It is a<br />

misdemeanour at common law, punishable with fine and<br />

imprisonment to any extent; and also with hard labour in<br />

the case of " any conspiracy to cheat or defraud, or to extort<br />

money or goods, or falsely to accuse of any crime, or to<br />

obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of public<br />

justice." * The offence is not triable at Quarter Sessions,<br />

unless the conspiracy is to commit a crime which would be<br />

triable at Quarter Sessions if committed by one person. 2<br />

It is a statutory misdemeanour, 3 punishable with ten<br />

years' penal servitude, to conspire to murder, or to endeavour<br />

to persuade or propose to any one to murder, any person,<br />

whether he be a subject of His Majesty or not, and whether<br />

he be within the King's dominions or not. Apparently no<br />

other conspiracy here to commit a crime abroad is triable in<br />

this country; still less is a conspiracy abroad to commit a<br />

crime here.<br />

The crime consists in the bare consent and agreement of<br />

the parties. 4<br />

It is 'not necessary that any of them should do<br />

any act in pursuance of their agreement. This is no breach<br />

of the rule laid down by Lord Mansfield, C. J., in E. v.<br />

Scofield, 5 that a bare intent, however criminal, is not punish-<br />

able by our law ; for the agreement itself is an act, and will<br />

i 14 & 15 Vict. c. 100, s. 29.<br />

2 Quarter Sessions Act, 1842 (5 & 6 Vict. c. 38), s. 1.<br />

3 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, s. 4. An article in a newspaper, exulting over the<br />

assassination of the Emperor of Russia and commending it as an example, was<br />

held to be an encouragement or endeavour to persuade to murder within this<br />

section, although it was not addressed to any one in particular : R. v. Mott<br />

(1881), 7 Q. B. D. 244.<br />

* See the judgments of Tindal, C. J., in O'Connell v. R. (1844), 11 CI. & F. at<br />

p. 233, and' of Lord Chelmsford in Mulcahy v. R. (1868), L. R. 3 H. L. at p. 328.<br />

5 (1784), Cald. S. C at p. 403.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!