02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

466 CONVERSION.<br />

in bailment, the right to recover possession, of them depends<br />

on the nature of the bailment. If it confers on the bailee a<br />

right to exclude the bailor from possession, the bailee alone<br />

can bring an action of conversion against such third person<br />

but if it does not confer any right on the bailee to exclude the<br />

bailor from possession, then either (but not both) can main-<br />

tain an action of conversion. For example, a pawnbroker or<br />

hirer of goods alone can bring an action of conversion so<br />

long as the pawning or hiring continues. On the other hand,<br />

where the bailment consists of a gratuitous loan of goods,<br />

either the bailor or the bailee can maintain such an action.<br />

But if the bailee himself converts the goods to his own use,<br />

the bailor can bring an action of conversion against him,<br />

whether the bailment be of a nature to exclude, the bailor<br />

from possession or not. Where the bailee is entitled to sue,<br />

he can recover the full value of the goods converted, although<br />

he would have had a good answer to an action by the bailor<br />

for damages for the loss of the goods. 1<br />

In order to succeed in an action of conversion the plaintiff<br />

must prove<br />

—<br />

(i.) that he had a right to the immediate possession of the<br />

goods ; and<br />

(ii.) that the defendant was in possession of the goods and<br />

converted them to his own use.<br />

On proof of these facts, the plaintiff will be entitled to<br />

recover as damages the loss which he has sustained.<br />

(i.) The ownership of goods prima facie involves the right<br />

to their possession. Hence the owner of goods can, as a rule,<br />

bring an action for their conversion by a stranger. If, how-<br />

ever, he has voluntarily parted with them to another for a<br />

definite time or purpose, he has no right to the immediate<br />

possession of the goods and cannot sue for their conversion by<br />

a third person, until that time has elapsed or that purpose has<br />

been effected. During such period only the person who is<br />

entitled to be in possession of them could sue the wrongdoer.<br />

* The Wink-field, [1902] P. 42, overruling Olaridge r. South Staffordshire "<br />

Tramway Co., [1892] 1 Q.^B. 422.<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!