02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REFUSAL TO ACT. 189<br />

II. Refusal to Act.<br />

Our law not only condemns abuse of power by a public<br />

official : it also punishes all wbo refuse or neglect to dis-<br />

charge the duties of their office.<br />

Every public officer, who wilfully refuses or neglects to<br />

perform any duty which he is by common law or by statute<br />

bound to perform, commits a misdemeanour, provided that<br />

such duty is not attended with greater danger than a man of<br />

ordinary firmness and courage might reasonably be called<br />

upon to encounter. Eor example, if a sheriff refuses to<br />

execute a criminal sentenced to death, he commits a mis-<br />

demeanour ;<br />

1 so does a justice of the peace who refrains from<br />

reading the proclamation set out in the Kiot Act, or from<br />

ordering soldiers to disperse a mob, because he is afraid to do<br />

so in circumstances in which a man of ordinary courage would<br />

not have been afraid. 2<br />

Every person, who unlawfully refuses or omits to serve<br />

any public office which he is by law required to accept if<br />

duly appointed, commits a misdemeanour. But this does not<br />

apply to cases in which the law imposes some other penalty<br />

for such refusal or neglect, or to cases in which a person is<br />

permitted by law or custom to make a composition in place<br />

of serving the office.<br />

One *of the greatest protections, which our law affords for<br />

the liberty of the person, is the writ of Habeas Corpus. If<br />

a man complains that he is illegally imprisoned, he or some<br />

one on his behalf is entitled to obtain this writ. It commands<br />

the person, in whose custody he is, to bring him bodily before<br />

the Court in order that it may be ascertained whether such<br />

imprisonment is illegal or not. Any act or contrivance by<br />

which a person so imprisoned is deprived of the protection of<br />

the writ will be severely punished. Thus a judge, who<br />

refuses to grant the writ on application made to him for<br />

good cause, is liable to a penalty of £500. Any gaoler, who<br />

refuses to make a return to the writ or neglects to deliver<br />

1 R v. Antrobus (1835), 2 A. & E. 798.<br />

2 R. v. Pinney (1832), 5 C. & P. 254.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!