02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2-18 NUISANCE.<br />

across a highway, ploughing it up, or erecting any fence or<br />

building, or placing any timber, stones or other obstacle on<br />

any part of it, is an illegal obstruction to the passage of the<br />

public along the way. Every one, in short, commits a public<br />

nuisance who does anything which renders the highway less<br />

or who<br />

commodious to the public than it would otherwise be ;<br />

prevents them from having access to any part of it by an<br />

excessive and unreasonable, though temporary, use of it ; or<br />

who so deals with the land in the immediate neighbourhood<br />

of the highway as to prevent the public from using and<br />

enjoying it securely.<br />

Thus it is a misdemeanour<br />

—<br />

1<br />

to saw timber or carry on any other trade in the street ;<br />

to allow waggons to stand before a warehouse for an unreasonable time<br />

so as to occupy a great part of the street for several hours by day or<br />

night<br />

;<br />

2<br />

to dig up the roadway without statutory authority in order to lay down<br />

gas-pipes<br />

;<br />

3<br />

to excavate an area close to a footpath and leave it unfenced<br />

;<br />

4 or<br />

to blast stone in a quarry so as to throw stones upon a public road or<br />

the houses abutting on it. 6<br />

And if a tramway be illegally laid down on a high road so as to<br />

obstruct the use of the road by common carriages, it is a public nuisance,<br />

although it may be a great convenience to many who go that way. 6<br />

Whether the obstruction proved is such as may in law<br />

amount to a nuisance is a question for the judge ; whether<br />

the particular obstruction complained of is in fact a nuisance<br />

to the public is for the jury. 7<br />

In strict law the smallest<br />

obstruction is illegal; but the consequences of the obstruction<br />

of a public thoroughfare or navigable river may in some cases<br />

be "so slight, uncertain and rare" as not to entail on the<br />

offending party criminal responsibility. 8<br />

Thus, in R. v. Bartholomeiv, the defendant had unlawfully erected and<br />

maintained a coffee-stall in the middle of the roadway of a public street.<br />

1 R. v. Jones (1812), 3 Camp. 230.<br />

8 M. v. Russell (1805), 6 East, 427; Att.-Oen. v. Briqhton, Ac, Supply Association,<br />

[1900] 1 Ch. 276.<br />

3<br />

11. v. Stoke Fenton Gas Co. (1860), 29 L. J. M. O. 148.<br />

* Barnes v. Ward (1850), 9 0. B. 392.<br />

6 R. v. Mutters (1864), 10 Cox, 6.<br />

G It. v. Train (1862), 2 B. & S. 640.<br />

> R. v. Betts (1850), 16 Q. B. 1022, 1038.<br />

9 R. v. Tindall (1837), 6 A. & E. 143 ; R. v. Charlesworth (1851), 16 Q. B 1012<br />

9 [1908] 1 K. B. 554.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!