02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

362 EMBEZZLEMENT, &C.<br />

without any authority to sell, negotiate, transfer or pledge<br />

the same. 1<br />

Falsification of Accounts.<br />

It was found that the path was often prepared for acts of<br />

embezzlement and other frauds by false entries being made by<br />

a clerk in the ledgers and other books of account of his<br />

employer, and also that such dishonest practices were often<br />

after their commission cloaked or concealed by similar fraudu-<br />

lent entries. Hence in the year 1875 an Act 2 was passed<br />

which makes the falsification of such books of account, with<br />

intent to defraud, a crime in itself, whether any pecuniary<br />

loss is thereby occasioned to the prisoner's employer or not.<br />

It enacts that any clerk or servant or the officer of any com-<br />

pany or corporation, who wilfully and with intent to defraud<br />

destroys, alters, mutilates or falsifies any book, paper or<br />

account belonging to or in the possession of his employer, or<br />

makes false entries therein, is guilty of a misdemeanour<br />

and liable to seven years' penal servitude. 3 -Falsifying the<br />

mechanical means whereby an account is brought into exist-<br />

ence, such as a taximeter, is falsifying an account within the<br />

meaning of this Act. 4<br />

But it is no offence under this Act<br />

for the servant of A., with however fraudulent an intent, to<br />

make false entries in the books of B. 5<br />

Fraudulent Conversion.<br />

Later it became necessary to pass another Act to deal with<br />

certain cases of fraudulent misappropriation, which did not<br />

clearly fall within the legal definition of either of the crimes<br />

larceny or embezzlement. If a factor or other agent, who<br />

is entrusted with goods for sale, converts them to his own use<br />

before any sale is effected, he is clearly guilty of larceny by<br />

a bailee. If he sells the goods and appropriates the proceeds,<br />

1<br />

See ss. 75 and 76 of the Larceny Act, 1861, which are not repealed, and es. 20<br />

and 22 of the Larceny Act, 1916.<br />

2<br />

38 & 39 Vict. c. 24. See indictment, No 11, in the Appendix.<br />

8 As to false entries or alterations in the books of the Bank of England or of the<br />

Bank of Ireland, see 24 & 25 Vict. c. 98, s. 5, which is not repealed by the Forgery Act,<br />

1913.<br />

4 JR. v. Salomon!, [1909] 2 K. B. 980.<br />

R. v. Palin, [1906] 1 K. B. 7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!