02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LIABILITY OF A DIRECTOR. 557<br />

only be made liable by means of the relation of principal and<br />

agent. 1<br />

But cases frequently occurred in which the directors of a new<br />

company, who issued the prospectus, were not aware that the<br />

statements which they so issued were untrue. They were<br />

misled by the promoters of the company and innocently<br />

published the facts and figures laid before them, and were<br />

therefore not liable to those who were defrauded by means of<br />

such facts and figures. To meet this difficulty an Act was<br />

passed, which renders all persons, who authorise the issue of<br />

a prospectus or notice, soliciting applications for shares or<br />

debentures in a company, liable in certain cases for any untrue<br />

statement contained in such prospectus or notice. 2<br />

Such persons are liable to pay compensation to any one who, on the faith<br />

of such prospectus or notice, has subscribed for shares, debentures or<br />

debenture stock, and lias suffered damage by reason of any untrue statement<br />

contained in the prospectus or notice, or in any report or memorandum<br />

set out or referred to therein or issued therewith, unless they can prove<br />

1. that, where the statement does not purport to be made on the<br />

authority of an expert or of a public official document or statement, they<br />

believed the statement to be true up to the time of allotment ;<br />

2. that, where the statement purports to be made by an expert, or to be<br />

contained in what purports to be a copy of or extract from a report or<br />

valuation of an engineer, valuer, accountant or other expert, it fairly<br />

represented the statement made or was a correct and fair copy or extract,,<br />

unless they had no reasonable ground for believing that the person making<br />

the statement, report or valuation was competent to make it ;<br />

3. that, where the statement purports to be made by an official person,<br />

or to be contained in what purports to be a copy of or extract from a public<br />

official document, it was a fair and correct representation of such statement,<br />

copy or extract ;<br />

or<br />

4. that, having consented to become directors, they withdrew their<br />

consent before the issue of the prospectus or notice, and that the same was<br />

issued without their knowledge or consent ;<br />

5. that the prospectus or notice was issued without their knowledge or<br />

consent, and that on becoming aware of its issue they forthwith gave<br />

reasonable public notice of such fact ;<br />

or<br />

6. that after the issue of such prospectus or notice and before allotment<br />

thereunder they, on becoming aware of any untrue statement therein, with-<br />

drew their consent thereto and caused reasonable public notice of such<br />

withdrawal, and of the reason therefor, to be given. 3<br />

1 See Weir v. Bell, tuprd.<br />

2 The Directors' Liability Act, 1890 (53 & 54 Vict. c. 64), re-enacted by the Companies-<br />

(Consolidation) Act, 1908 (8 Edw. VII. c. 69), s. 84.<br />

s See last note, and Maoleay v. Tait, [1906] A. C. 24.<br />

or<br />

or<br />

or<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!