02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

516 DEFAMATION.<br />

they are spoken, some one must hear them. Thoughts<br />

by themselves are not actionable : merely composing or<br />

even writing down defamatory words is not a tort, unless<br />

they be subsequently published. No action will lie if the<br />

words be communicated only to the person defamed ; for that<br />

does not injure his reputation, though it may wound his self-<br />

esteem. A man's reputation is the estimate in which others<br />

hold him, not the good opinion which he has of himself. It<br />

may be that the defendant desired and intended, and did all<br />

in his power, to publish words defamatory of the plaintiff,<br />

yet if they never reach the ear or eye of any one except the<br />

plaintiff, no tort has been committed. To be actionable, the<br />

words must be published by the defendant to some person<br />

other than the plaintiff, and must make that other person<br />

think worse of the plaintiff.<br />

The intention or motive with which the words were<br />

published is, as a rule, immaterial. If the defendant has in<br />

fact injured the plaintiff's reputation, he is liable, although he<br />

had no such purpose in his mind when he spoke or wrote the<br />

words. Every one must be presumed to know and to intend<br />

the natural and ordinary consequences of his acts. Even if<br />

the defendant at the time he published the words did not<br />

attend to or think of their natural or probable consequences,<br />

or hoped or expected that these consequences would not follow,<br />

this can only go to mitigate the damages ; it is no answer to<br />

the action.<br />

Sometimes, however, it is a man's duty to speak fully and<br />

freely and without thought or fear of the consequences, and<br />

then the above rule does not apply. The words are privileged<br />

by reason of the occasion on which they were employed ; and<br />

no action lies unless the plaintiff can prove that the defendant<br />

was actuated by some wicked or indirect motive. But in all<br />

other cases (although the pleader invariably alleges that the<br />

words were published falsely and maliciously) malice need<br />

never be proved at the trial; the words are actionable, if<br />

false and defamatory, although published inadvertently or<br />

with an honest belief in their truth. Unless the occasion<br />

be privileged, malice is no part of the cause of action;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!