02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CRIMINAL INTENTION. 113<br />

may think that the act which he intends to do is only a tort,<br />

or is even a lawful act ; nevertheless, if it be a crime, he has<br />

formed a criminal intention. Ignorance of our law is no<br />

excuse, even for a foreigner who is only temporarily within<br />

our shores. An intent to do any act which is, in fact,<br />

criminal is sufficient.<br />

But what is an intention, and how does it differ from a<br />

motive ?<br />

A man's intention is his determination to do or not to do<br />

a particular act ; his motive is his reason for forming that<br />

determination. He intends to do that which he means and<br />

tries to do ; his motive is what makes him intend to do that<br />

act—it is the spur which stimulates him to action. On the<br />

question of " guilty " or " not guilty " our law as a rule<br />

disregards the prisoner's motives, though they may affect<br />

the amount of the punishment.<br />

The criminal law regards the prisoner's acts ; from these<br />

it infers his intention. But it is not so easy to divine his<br />

motive ; to discover that, it is generally necessary to inquire<br />

into all the surrounding circumstances, including what he said<br />

or did on other occasions. The absence of any apparent<br />

motive may be some ground for urging that the prisoner is<br />

insane, or that there has been a mistake as to identity and<br />

that the prisoner is not the person who committed the crime<br />

in question. But if a man, who is of full age, sane, sober,<br />

and free either to act or abstain from acting, is proved to<br />

have done an act which is criminal, he is liable, whether his<br />

motive was good or bad, or whether he had none. He has<br />

done an act which is forbidden by our law, and it will be no<br />

defence for him to urge that he had a laudable motive, or<br />

even that he conscientiously believed on religious grounds<br />

that it was his duty to do the act.<br />

It is the intention and not the motive which gives in law<br />

the character and quality to an act. If a man intends to do<br />

one thing, but in fact does another, he will be judged by<br />

what he did and not by what he intended to do. He may<br />

thus be liable for results which he never desired or even con-<br />

templated. " The intention to do the act exists for all<br />

B.O.L. 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!