02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CRUELTY TO ANIMALS. 235<br />

A century ago the law extended no protection to the dumb creation ;<br />

" an animal had no rights." Bear-baiting and cock-fighting were per-<br />

fectly legal, though prize-fighting was always, in the view of the law, illegal<br />

—a rule which was inoperative in practice. And acts of scandalous<br />

cruelty were constantly practised on animals of all kinds. In 1822 was<br />

passed the first measure restraining cruelty to cattle and beasts of burden<br />

—a measure due to the direct advocacy of Jeremy Bentham. 1 In 1833<br />

bear-baitiDg and cock-fighting were prohibited within five miles of Temple<br />

Bar—not, be it observed, out of any pity for those animals, but because<br />

such sports collected crowds of noisy and riotous persons, which interfered<br />

with the comfort of orderly citizens. 2 So to set animals to fight in any<br />

thoroughfare or public place within the metropolis was in 1839 declared to<br />

be a public nuisance and made punishable with a fine. 3 In 1835 it was<br />

enacted that whoever put an ajiimal in the pound must supply it with<br />

food ; he must not leave it there to starve. 4 In 1849 was passed a general<br />

Act for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. 6<br />

It extended the Act of<br />

1822 to all tame animals; 8 it also dealt with slaughterhouses, and insisted<br />

on more merciful methods of slaughtering animals. 7<br />

It was in its turn<br />

extended and amended by the Cruelty to Animals Act, 1854 8 and both<br />

;<br />

these Acts are now repealed by the Act of 1911.<br />

It was not until 1900 that any protection was afforded to wild animals<br />

in captivity, such as rabbits in a hutch or lions in a menagerie. It was<br />

held in two cases' that neither the Act of 1849 nor that of 1854 protected<br />

wild animals in captivity. Hence it was necessary to pass in 1900 an<br />

Act 10 which made it an offence punishable with fine or imprisonment for<br />

any person wantonly or unreasonably to cause unnecessary suffering to any<br />

animal that is confined, maimed or pinioned, or to cruelly abuse, infuriate,<br />

tease or terrify it.<br />

The following are the main provisions of the Protection of<br />

Animals Act, 1911, which applies to captive as well as to<br />

domestic animals. 11<br />

By section 1 any person, who<br />

(a) shall cruelly beat, kick, ill-treat, over-ride, over-drive,<br />

over-load, torture, infuriate or terrify any animal,<br />

or shall cause or procure any animal to be so used,<br />

i 3 Geo. IV. c. 71.<br />

2 3 Sc i Will. IV. c. 19, s. 29.<br />

8 2 & 3 Vict. c. 47, s. 54 (2).<br />

* 5 & 6 Will. IV. o. 69.<br />

» 12 & 13 Vict. o. 92.<br />

» S. 29 ; and see 17 & 18 Vict. c. 60, s. 3.<br />

T Ss. 7—12.<br />

» 17 & 18 Vict. c. 60.<br />

9 Aplin v. Porritt, [1893] 2 Q. B. 57 j Harper v. Marcks, [1894] 2 Q. B. 319.<br />

10 Wild Animals in Captivity Protection Act (63 & 64 Vict. c. 33), now repealed by<br />

the Act of 1911.<br />

" 1 & 2 Geo. V. c, 27, s. 15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!