02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

80 CUSTOMS.<br />

servants, of measuring, shovelling, unloading and delivering all oysters<br />

brought in any boat or vessel for sale along the river Thames to any place<br />

within the limits of the port of London, and of receiving a reasonable com-<br />

pensation for so doing, and the jury found that 8s,. for every score for the<br />

first hundred bushels and 4s. for every score of bushels of the remainder<br />

of a cargo was a reasonable recompense to them for the labour of shovelling,<br />

unloading and delivering out the oysters. 1<br />

(5) A local custom ought to be certain. And therefore a<br />

custom that lands shall descend to the most worthy of the<br />

owner's blood is void; for how shall this worth be deter-<br />

mined ? But a custom that lands shall descend to the next<br />

male of the blood exclusive of females is certain, and there-<br />

fore good. So a custom to pay twopence an acre in lieu of<br />

tithes is good; but to pay sometimes twopence and some-<br />

times threepence, as the occupier of the land pleases, is bad for<br />

its uncertainty. 2 A custom, however, for the inhabitants of<br />

a parish to enter upon plaintiff's enclosed field within the<br />

parish and erect a maypole therein, and enjoy on the land<br />

any lawful and innocent recreation at any time in the year,<br />

has been held reasonable and sufficiently certain. 3<br />

So a<br />

custom to pay a reasonable sum for a certain privilege is not<br />

void merely because the fee is not definitely fixed. 4<br />

(6) A local custom, when thus established, becomes the<br />

law of the particular place wherein it has been shown to obtain. 5<br />

Hence a custom to be valid must always be compulsory, and<br />

not left to the option of every man, whether he will use it or<br />

no. Therefore a custom that all the inhabitants of a parti-<br />

cular district shall be rated towards the maintenance of a bridge<br />

but a custom that every man was to contri-<br />

would be good ;<br />

bute at his own pleasure would be absurd and, indeed, no<br />

custom at all. For the same reason customs must be con-<br />

sistent with each other. Two conflicting customs cannot<br />

prevail in the same locality ; for, if both are really customs,<br />

then both are of equal antiquity and equally compulsory, and<br />

this is impossible where they are contradictory.<br />

i Laybourn v. Crisp (1838), 4 M. & W. 320.<br />

2 1 Bla. Com. 78 ; Blewett v. Tregonning (1835), 3 A. & E. 554.<br />

3 Ball v. Nottingham (1876), 1 Ex. D. 1.<br />

* Mills v. Mayor, $c, of Colchester (1867), L. E. 2 C. P. 476, 484.<br />

5 Tyson v. Smith (1838), 9 A. & E. 406, 426.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!