02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e indicted for perjury, 1<br />

PERJURY. 197<br />

but is liable on summary conviction<br />

to such, punishment as is provided by section 11 of the<br />

Summary Jurisdiction Act, 1879, 2 in the case of juvenile<br />

offenders.<br />

The amount of punishment, which the Court can give on a conviction<br />

for perjury, does not depend on the number of " assignments of perjury,''<br />

as they are called, but on the number of oaths taken and broken. For<br />

each such false oath the defendant may be sentenced to seven years' penal<br />

servitude, although only one of his statements made on that oath be proved<br />

false. But if he was sworn on two occasions, and on each occasion wilfully<br />

made the same false statement, he can be sent to penal servitude for fourteen<br />

years.<br />

(ii.) He must have been sworn in a judicial proceeding.<br />

This expression " includes a proceeding before any Court,<br />

tribunal or person having by law power to hear, receive and<br />

examine evidence on oath." 8 Thus if a false statement be<br />

wilfully made in an affidavit or given on commission in<br />

England for the purpose of being used in a judicial pro-<br />

ceeding in any <strong>English</strong>, colonial or foreign Court, this is<br />

perjury and triable here. 4 A prisoner who pleads guilty and<br />

is subsequently sworn as a witness can be convicted of perjury. 5<br />

If the oath is not administered in a judicial proceeding, the<br />

crime is not perjury, but the misdemeanour of making a false<br />

statement on oath, which is punishable with equal severity<br />

under section 2 of the Perjury Act, 1911. But a false statement<br />

made on oath before a court-martial, 6 or in any arbitration<br />

within the Arbitration Act, 1889, 7 or under the Work-<br />

men's Compensation Act, 1906, 8 is punishable under section 1 )<br />

as these Courts have power to hear evidence on oath.<br />

It was formerly necessary that the Court in which the alleged perjury was<br />

committed should not only have power to administer an oath, but also tha<br />

it should have jurisdiction to try the case then before it. 9 But the Act o<br />

1911 contains no words requiring the latter, and the omission is probably<br />

1 Perjury Act, 1911 (1 & 2 Geo. V. c. 6), *. 16 (2).<br />

2 42 & 43 Vict. c. 49.<br />

8 S. 16 (2).<br />

* S. 1 (4), (5), and s. 8<br />

« M. v. W/ieeler, [1917] 1 K. B. 283.<br />

« It. v. Ileane (1864), 4 B. & S. 947.<br />

? 52 & 53 Vict. c. 49, s. 22.<br />

8 6 Edw. VII. c. 58 ; and see K. v. Crossley, [1909] 1 K. B. 411.<br />

° 3 Co Inst. 166 ; R. v. Dunning (1871), L. K. 1 C. C. Ii. 290.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!