02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

194 OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE,<br />

shall be liable to be proceeded against, indicted, tried and<br />

punished as if he were a principal offender. Every person,<br />

who incites or attempts to procure or suborn another person<br />

to commit an offence against this Act, shall be guilty of a<br />

misdemeanour and, on conviction thereof on indictment, shall<br />

be liable to imprisonment, or to a fine, or to both such<br />

imprisonment and fine." 1<br />

. Any conspiracy to defeat the ends of justice, e.g., by dis-<br />

suading witnesses from giving evidence or by obstructing any<br />

legal process, civil or criminal, is a misdemeanour. 2<br />

conspiracy to accuse another falsely of a crime. 3<br />

So is any<br />

Again any one, who fabricates a false document, which if<br />

genuine would be admissible in evidence in any judicial<br />

proceeding, or tenders such a document in evidence knowing<br />

it to have been so fabricated, is liable to the same punishment<br />

as a witness who is convicted of perjury. It is a felony<br />

punishable with penal servitude for life or for various terms<br />

of years for any one to forge official or public documents,<br />

foreign or colonial acts of State and judgments, orders of an<br />

<strong>English</strong> Court, registers, by-laws, registers of British vessels,<br />

certificates of convictions or acquittals, examined or certified<br />

copies of any of these documents, or to tender the same in<br />

evidence knowing them to have been forged. 4 So the fraudu-<br />

lent fabrication of real evidence—as, for example, by tampering<br />

with sealed samples—is a misdemeanour at common law. 6<br />

A man who wilfully makes a false statement on oath, but not in a<br />

judicial proceeding, is not guilty of perjury. But he was at common law<br />

guilty of the misdemeanour of " making a false oath," and was punishable<br />

with two years' imprisonment without hard labour. A more severe punishment<br />

is now assigned by the Perjury Act, 1911, 8 which enacts that " if any<br />

person<br />

—<br />

(i.) being required or authorised by law to make any statement on oath<br />

for any purpose, and being lawfully sworn (otherwise than in a<br />

judicial proceeding), wilfully makes a statement which is material<br />

1 S. 7.<br />

2 B. v. Mawbey (1796), 6 T. R. 619 ; 3 R. R. 282.<br />

8 14 & 16 Vict. c. 100, s. 29.<br />

4 Forgery Act, 1913 CA & i Geo. V. c. 27), s. 3.<br />

6 R. v. Vreones, [189)7 1 Q. B. 360.<br />

6 Ss. 2, 3(1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!