02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 HOW TO ASCERTAIN THE LAW.<br />

can try any action arising out of a contract, if the amount claimed exceeds<br />

£50, must yield to a special provision that certain county courts can try<br />

any claim arising out of an agreement for the use or hire of any ship, even<br />

if it exceeds £50.<br />

Again, by section 3 of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1846, x an action for the<br />

benefit of the wife or child of a person whose death has been caused by<br />

the wrongful act, neglect, or default of another must be commenced<br />

within twelve calendar months of the death of the deceased. By sec-<br />

tion 1 of the Public Authorities Protection Act, 1893, a an action against<br />

any person for any act done in pursuance, or execution, or intended<br />

execution of any Act of Parliament, or in respect of any alleged neglect or<br />

default in the execution of any Act, must be commenced within six months.<br />

An action under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1846, was brought against the<br />

defendants, a statutory body formed to maintain a hospital, to recover<br />

damages for the death of a patient in the hospital caused by the negligent<br />

act of a nurse in the defendants' employment ; the writ was issued more<br />

than six months, but less than twelve months, after the death of the<br />

deceased. Held, that the action was brought too late, and was not main-<br />

tainable. 3<br />

(viii.) A statute which destroys, infringes or restricts any-<br />

existing right will be construed strictly. "The burthen<br />

lies on those who seek to establish that the Legislature<br />

intended to take away the private rights of individuals to<br />

show that by express words, or by necessary implication,<br />

such an intention appears." 4 Thus cases not infrequently<br />

occur in which it is necessary for the benefit of the<br />

community as a whole to take private property away from<br />

its owner. But such an invasion of private right is never<br />

sanctioned without due inquiry, and when it is sanctioned<br />

compensation should always be granted to the owner of the<br />

property taken. A clause to this effect is almost invariably<br />

inserted in the Act which legalises the infringement. And<br />

even in the absence of any such clause, " it is a proper rule<br />

of construction not to construe an Act of Parliament as inter-<br />

fering with or injuring persons' rights without compensation,<br />

unless one is obliged to so construe it." 6<br />

1 9 & 10 Vict. c. 93.<br />

2 56 & 57 Vict. o. 61.<br />

s Markey and another<br />

[1900] 2 Q. B. 454.<br />

v. Tolworth Joimt Isolation Hospital District Board,<br />

i Per Lord Blackburn in Metropolitan Asylum District v. Hill (1881), 6 App. Cas.<br />

193, at p. 208.<br />

6 Per Brett, M. E., in Att.-Gen. v. Horner (1884),. 14 Q. B. D. at p. 257 ; and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!