02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GENERAL LOCAL CCTST0M3. 77<br />

shall inherit his land in equal shares, and not the eldest son alone. Again,<br />

there is a custom in certain ancient boroughs, and therefore called borough-<br />

<strong>English</strong>, that the youngest son shall inherit the estate in preference to all<br />

his elder brothers. 1<br />

These customs are so well known that the Court will<br />

take judicial notice of them ; it is only necessary to prove that the custom<br />

is applicable to the lands in question. And in other boroughs there is a<br />

custom that a widow shall be entitled for her dower to the rents and profits<br />

of all her husband's lands during her lifetime, whereas at the common law<br />

she is entitled for dower to only one third part of them.<br />

Again, where a tenant for life is forbidden to commit waste, he may not<br />

fell timber ; and by the word " timber " is meant, as a rule, oak, ash<br />

and elm trees. In Buckinghamshire and other counties beech is also<br />

timber by custom 2<br />

; so in other places is willow. But there cannot be a<br />

custom to prevent tenants for life from cutting down larch trees, as larch<br />

trees were unknown in England before the reign of James I. 3 Agricultural<br />

and trade customs may vary, and this is for the public good. But a custom<br />

defining or restricting the rights of a limited owner of land must be<br />

immemorial.<br />

A local custom, therefore, so far as it extends, supersedes<br />

the general law. 4<br />

It derives its validity from long-continued<br />

usage. From such usage, it was said, the consent of those<br />

immediately affected by it might be implied. But as a<br />

matter of fact such consent was never consciously asked or<br />

given ; nor is proof of any such consent necessary to the<br />

validity of the custom. The fact that the custom is incon-<br />

sistent with the general law of the land will not render it bad<br />

in law. But no local custom can prevail against an express<br />

Act of Parliament. Every custom—in theory at all events<br />

—must be anterior in date to any statute, and an express<br />

subsequent statute will override any antecedent custom. 5<br />

Thus all local customs with regard to wills and all customs, which declare<br />

that women and children shall have rights of succession indefeasible by<br />

will, have been abrogated by statute. 6 Again, a custom to weigh 18 ounces<br />

to a pound is bad, for the statute 13 & 14 Car. II. c. 26 takes it for granted<br />

that a pound shall consist of 16 ounces. 7<br />

653.<br />

i See Muggleton v. Barnett (1856), 1 H. & N. 282 ; 2H.&N.<br />

2 Dashwood v. Magniac, [1891] 3 Ch. 306.<br />

3 In re Harrison's Trusts (1884), 28 Ch. D. 220, 227 ; and see the dissenting<br />

judgment of Kay, L. J., in Dashwood v. Magniac, [1891] 3 Ch. at p. 379.<br />

* See the remarks of Best, C. J., in Lord Falmouth v. George (1828), 5 Bing.<br />

at p. 293.<br />

6 Mayor, #c, of New Windsor t. Taylor, [1899] A. C. 41 ; but see Lanchbury<br />

v. Bode, [1898] 2 Ch. 120.<br />

6 The Statute of Distributions (22 & 23 Car. 11., c. 10), s. 4 ; and 19 & 20 Vict. o. 94,<br />

7 Noble v. Durrell (1789), 3 T. E. 271, 271. See further, as to a custom being<br />

abrogated by statute, Truscott r. Merchant Taylors' Co. (1856), 11 Ex. 855.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!