02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONFLICTING CASES. 67<br />

decision before him, and then contrast them with the essential<br />

facts of the case on which he is advising. To test whether<br />

a fact is or is not essential he must ask himself, Would the<br />

case be decided otherwise if this fact were absent ?<br />

Having thus ascertained from each decision separately the<br />

principle which governed it, his next step is to contrast each<br />

of these decisions with others bearing on the same point.<br />

But it sometimes happens that the decisions seem to be in<br />

conflict. Often this conflict is apparent rather than real ; on<br />

investigation it will be found that the essential facts of the<br />

two cases are not identical ; hence decisions, which are<br />

apparently in conflict, will often be reconciled as soon as one<br />

ascertains on what facts they respectively depend. The first<br />

case may be on one side of a border line, and the second on<br />

the other. One case, for instance, may refer to a compulsory<br />

and the other to a voluntary liquidation ; or in one case<br />

the female defendant may have been married before January<br />

1st, 1883, and in the other after that date ; and so any<br />

apparent discrepancy disappears.<br />

But if the conflicting cases cannot be thus distinguished,<br />

the practitioner is face to face with this difficulty : different<br />

Courts, when dealing with identically the same facts, have<br />

laid down different rules of law. Even for this calamity<br />

well-known rules of practice have been provided. " There is<br />

no statute or common law rule by which one Court is bound<br />

to abide by the decision of another of equal rank ; it does so<br />

simply from what may be called the comity among judges.<br />

In the same way there is no common law or statutory rule to<br />

oblige a Court to bow to its own decisions ; it does so again<br />

on the ground of judicial comity." * This so-called comity<br />

has, however, been formulated into rules which, though<br />

unwritten, are habitually followed by our Courts.<br />

The most recent decision of the House of Lords on any<br />

point is binding on all Courts of inferior rank. It is also<br />

binding on the House of Lords itself. This is so, even<br />

although on the former occasion the House was equally<br />

i Per Brett, M. B., in The Vera Crux (No. 2) (1884), 9 P. D. at p. 98.<br />

5—<br />

a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!