02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter IV.<br />

TRESPASS TO LAND.<br />

Any direct physical interference with, the person of another<br />

or with any real or personal property in the possession of<br />

another, without his consent or other lawful authority is a<br />

trespass, if the act was done intentionally or was the result<br />

of negligence. 1 To be a trespass, the defendant's act must be<br />

a direct and immediate invasion of a private right of the<br />

plaintiff's. Thus, any wrongful entry upon the land of<br />

another, or any immediate physical interference with the<br />

possession of such land, is a trespass to land.<br />

Any wrongful act which directly disturbs any one in his<br />

lawful possession of goods, however slight or temporary such<br />

disturbance may be, is a trespass to goods. Any direct<br />

interference with the liberty or person of another, if it be<br />

either intentional or the result of negligence, is a trespass to<br />

the person. 1<br />

These three kinds of trespass will be separately<br />

discussed in this and the two following chapters.<br />

Any one who is in lawful occupation of land is entitled to<br />

the exclusive use and possession of it ; and any intrusion<br />

upon the premises which interferes with his enjoyment of<br />

them is a trespass. A trespass may be in its nature contin-<br />

uous or perpetually recurring, as where a man continues<br />

illegally in the dwelling-house of another after a forcible<br />

entry into it, or where he walks or rides daily across the<br />

field of another. " Every continuation of a trespass is a fresh<br />

trespass." 2<br />

It is not necessary in every case in which a trespass to land<br />

has been committed for the occupier of the land to take legal<br />

1 See Holmes v. Mather (1876), L. R. 10 Ex. 261 ; Stanley v. Powell, [1891]<br />

1 Q B. 86.<br />

2 Per Parke, B., in Percival v. Stamp (1863), 9 Exoh. at p. 174.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!