02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COPYRIGHT. 6091<br />

whose name is so printed or indicated shall, unless the contrary is proved<br />

be presumed to be the author of the work ;<br />

(b) if no name is so printed or indicated, or if the name so printed or<br />

indicated is not. the author's true name or the name by which he is<br />

commonly known, and a name purporting to be that of the publisher or<br />

proprietor of the work is printed or otherwise indicated thereon in the<br />

usual manner, the person whose name is so printed or indicated shall, unless-<br />

the contrary is proved, be presumed to be the owner of the copyright in<br />

the work for the purposes of proceedings in respect of the infringement<br />

of copyright therein." 1<br />

By section 16 of the Copyright Act, 1842, the defendant in an action<br />

for infringement of copyright in a book was required, if he disputed the<br />

plaintiff's copyright, to give a notice in writing stating the grounds of<br />

his objections to the plaintiff's title to copyright. This section has now<br />

been repealed, and is not re-enacted by the Copyright Act, 1911. The<br />

defendant nevertheless must, it is submitted, under the general rules of<br />

pleading now in force, state such objections in the body of his Defence,<br />

or in a separate document delivered therewith. 2<br />

The plaintiff must also prove that the defendant has<br />

infringed his copyright. Any unauthorised reproduction<br />

of a book, or any substantial part of it, that interferes with the<br />

profit and enjoyment which the owner of the copyright may<br />

fairly expect to derive from it amounts to an infringement. 8<br />

It makes no difference that the reproduction was merely for<br />

gratuitous distribution and not for profit. 4<br />

Printing a copy or<br />

selling a copy is an infringement, and it is no answer to a<br />

claim for an injunction that at the date of the infringement<br />

the defendant " was not aware and had no reasonable ground<br />

for suspecting that copyright subsisted in the work." 5<br />

It is an infringement of the copyright in a book to import<br />

into any part of the British dominions any pirated copy of<br />

such book for sale or hire, or to knowingly sell, publish or<br />

offer for sale or hire, or have in possession for sale or hire,<br />

any such pirated copy. 6<br />

Difficult questions sometimes arise as to the extent to which it is<br />

permissible for one author to quote from another. No tort is, of course,<br />

i S. 6 (3).<br />

2 See Order XIX. rr. 4, 6, 15.<br />

s See Educational Co. of Ireland v. Fallon, [1919] 1 Ir. K. 62.<br />

i Novello v. Sudlow (1852), 12 C. B. 177.<br />

« 6. 8.<br />

e 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, s. 17.<br />

B.C.L.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!