02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONTEMPT OF COURT. 203<br />

grave cases a warrant may be issued to bring him before the<br />

Court under arrest. A motion to commit the offender is often<br />

accompanied by a motion for an injunction to restrain him<br />

from any further contemptuous acts of a similar kind.<br />

Affidavits may be filed on both sides ; there is no jury ; the<br />

Court offended itself hears the case and fixes the punishment,<br />

inflicting either a fine or imprisonment for a time certain, or<br />

both, to any extent in its discretion. The offender, however,<br />

is often released after a short period of confinement, if he<br />

apologises and so " purges his contempt."<br />

A superior Court of Eecord has power thus to interfere<br />

summarily and to fine the offender or commit him to prison in<br />

all cases, in which an indictment for sedition would lie, and<br />

in some others in which it would not. 1<br />

It is in this case im-<br />

material whether the contempt be committed in the presence<br />

of the Court or at a time when the Court is not sitting and at<br />

a distance from it. 2<br />

An inferior Court of Record, however, can only commit an<br />

offender to prison where the contempt was committed in open<br />

Court. 3 The judge must at the moment be actually dis-<br />

charging his duty ; and the words employed or act done must<br />

either be pointedly and personally disrespectful to the judge<br />

himself, or else amount to a serious obstruction of the course<br />

of justice.<br />

An inferior Court not of Eecord has at common law no<br />

power to commit for contempt ; but in a few cases such a<br />

power has been expressly conferred by statute. 4<br />

It can, how-<br />

ever, always eject any one whose conduct is such as to obstruct<br />

the business of the Court, or order him to find sureties for his<br />

But the High Court has jurisdiction to<br />

good behaviour. 5<br />

punish by attachment contempts of inferior Courts, especially<br />

if the case will in the ordinary course come before the High<br />

Court. 6<br />

1 Per Lord Halt, C. J., in R. v. Rogers (1702), 7 Mod. at p. 29.<br />

2 Crawford's Case (1849), 1 Q. B. 613.<br />

s R. v. Lefroy (1873), L. R. 8 Q. B. 131 ; R v. Judge of the County Court of Surrey<br />

(1884), 13 Q. B. D. 963.<br />

4 See, for instance, 28 Vict. c. 36, s. 16.<br />

5 McDermott v. Judges of British Guiana (1868), L. B. 2 P. C. 341.<br />

« R. v. Parke, [1903] 2 K. B. 432 ; R. v. Davies, [1906] 1 K. B. 32.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!