02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

282 MURDER.<br />

where a person feloniously uses an instrument or other means with intent<br />

to procure a miscarriage, and the woman dies in consequence of his<br />

felonious act, then, if when he did the act he must as a reasonable man have<br />

contemplated that death or grievous bodily harm was likely to result, he is<br />

guilty of murder. But if when, he did the act he had not at the time in<br />

contemplation, and could not as a reasonable man have contemplated, either<br />

of those consequences, he is guilty only of manslaughter. "<br />

If is no defence to an indictment for murder that the<br />

prisoner risked his own life, or that the deceased consented to<br />

expose himself to a similar risk. Thus, the facts that either<br />

party challenged the other to fight a duel, that the other<br />

accepted the challenge and met his antagonist at an agreed<br />

time and place, are immaterial, if either party was killed in<br />

the duel. Any one, who incites or encourages another to kill<br />

a third person or even to kill himself, is liable, if death<br />

ensues, as an accessory before the fact or, if present at the<br />

commission of the crime, as a principal in the second degree.<br />

Where, upon a previous arrangement, and after there has been time for<br />

the blood to cool, two persons meet with deadly weapons, and one of them is<br />

killed, the party who occasions the death is guilty of murder, and the seconds<br />

also are equally guilty. With respect to others shown to be present, the<br />

question is, did they aid, assist, countenance or encourage the principals in<br />

their contest ? Mere presence will not be sufficient ; but if they sustain the<br />

principals either by advice or assistance, or go to the ground for the purpose<br />

of encouraging and forwarding the unlawful conflict, although they do not<br />

say or do anything,' yet if they are present, assisting and encouraging by<br />

their presence at the moment when the fatal shot is fired, they are, in law,<br />

guilty of the crime of murder. 1<br />

If one of the combatants at a prise-fight is killed, the surviving com-<br />

batant, both seconds and the referee are indictable for manslaughter ;<br />

so is any person who is present and encouraging the combatants. 2 But<br />

mere voluntary presence at such a fight does not necessarily render those<br />

present guilty as aiding and abetting unless they do something to incite or<br />

encourage the combatants. 3<br />

So, if two persons mutually agree to commit suicide together, and the<br />

means employed to produce death take effect upon one only, the survivor<br />

will, in point of law, be guilty of murder ;<br />

for each intended that the other<br />

should die, and each incited the other to commit the crime by agreeing<br />

that he would himself commit suicide also. 4<br />

1 B. v. Young and Webber (1838), 8 C. & P. 644.<br />

2 B. v. Murphy (1833), 6 C. & P. 103.<br />

' B. v. Coney and others (1882), 8 Q. B. D. 534.<br />

* B. v. Alison (1838), 8 C. & P. 418 ; B. v. Dyson (1823), Russ. & Ry. 523. See<br />

also B. v. Jessop (1877), 16 Cox, 204.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!