02.04.2013 Views

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

Odger's English Common Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

542 DEFAMATION.<br />

Actions of this kind may be grouped under three heads :<br />

1. Slander of title.<br />

2. "Words which disparage the goods manufactured or sold<br />

hv another.<br />

3. Other words which have occasioned loss to the plaintiff.<br />

1. Slander of Title.<br />

This term is usually employed to include all statements,<br />

whether written or spoken, which impeach a man's title to<br />

any property. Such words clearly do not affect his reputa-<br />

tion ;<br />

for his character would stand equally high whether he<br />

owned that property or not. When the plaintiff possesses<br />

property, and any one maliciously comes forward and falsely<br />

denies or impugns the plaintiff's title to it, an action lies to<br />

recover any damage thereby caused to the plaintiff. It<br />

makes no difference whether the defendant's words be spoken,<br />

written or printed, save as affecting the amount of<br />

damages. The property may be either real or personal ; and<br />

the plaintiff's estate or interest in it may be either in posses-<br />

sion or reversion. It need not be even a vested interest, so<br />

long as it is anything that is saleable or that has a market<br />

value.<br />

The words must be false ; if there be such a flaw in the<br />

plaintiff's title as the defendant asserts, no action lies.<br />

Next the statement must be malicious ; if it be made in the<br />

honest assertion of the defendant's own right—real or<br />

supposed—to the property, no action lies. But whenever a<br />

man unnecessarily intermeddles in the affairs of others with<br />

which he has no concern, such officious interference will be<br />

•deemed malicious and he will be liable, if damage follow.<br />

Lastly, special damage must be proved and shown to have<br />

arisen from the defendant's words. And for this purpose it<br />

is generally necessary for the plaintiff to prove that he was<br />

in the act of letting or selling his property, and that the<br />

•defendant by his words prevented an intending tenant or<br />

purchaser from taking a lease or completing the purchase.<br />

The special damage must always be such as naturally or<br />

reasonably arises from the use of the words. 1<br />

i Eaddan v. Lott (1854), 15 0. B. 411.<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!