03.04.2013 Views

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and language.’ 67 Hindutva advocates consider Savarkar’s monograph Hindutva:<br />

Who Is a Hindu, which was first published in 1923, as <strong>the</strong>ir text. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

publishers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> later editions claim that ‘Savarkar’s book is for all time’ as <strong>the</strong><br />

principles outlined ‘in this book will guide Hindus … for centuries to come.’ 68 As<br />

Ronald Neufeldt comments, this book has not only outlined <strong>the</strong> ‘ideology <strong>of</strong><br />

Hindutva but also <strong>the</strong> program <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hindutva forces <strong>of</strong> today.’ 69 His discussion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> essential qualification <strong>of</strong> a Hindu reveals <strong>the</strong> Hindutva intrigue to alienate<br />

Muslims and Christians from <strong>the</strong> mainstream Indian society. According to him, ‘a<br />

Hindu is that to him <strong>the</strong> land that extends from Sindhu to Sindhu is <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>rland<br />

(Pitribhu), <strong>the</strong> Mo<strong>the</strong>rland (Matribhu), <strong>the</strong> land <strong>of</strong> his patriarchs and forefa<strong>the</strong>rs.’<br />

Savarkar made it more clear and specific when he said:<br />

That is why in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> our Mohammedan [Muslim] or Christian<br />

countrymen who had originally been forcibly converted to a non-Hindu religion<br />

and who consequently have inherited along with Hindus, a common Fa<strong>the</strong>rland<br />

and a greater part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wealth <strong>of</strong> a common culture- language, law, customs,<br />

folklore and history- are not and can not [sic] be recognized as Hindus. For<br />

though Hindustan to <strong>the</strong>m is Fa<strong>the</strong>rland as to any o<strong>the</strong>r Hindu yet it is not to <strong>the</strong>m<br />

a Holyland too. Their holyland is far <strong>of</strong>f in Arabia or Palestine. Their mythology<br />

and Godmen, ideas and heroes are not <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> this soil. Consequently <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

names and <strong>the</strong>ir outlook smack <strong>of</strong> a foreign origin. 70<br />

67 Michael, ‘Hindu Nationalism,’ 482.<br />

68 Savarkar, Hindutva, x.<br />

69 Neufeldt, ‘Hindutva and <strong>the</strong> Rhetoric,’ 157.<br />

70 Savarkar, Hindutva, 113. For more details, see pp.110-113.<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!