03.04.2013 Views

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

helps to ‘create <strong>the</strong> bonds <strong>of</strong> mutual accountability’ between <strong>the</strong> local and <strong>the</strong><br />

global. 87<br />

Following Schreiter, Bevans affirms <strong>the</strong> significant role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> faith community in<br />

<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>contextual</strong> <strong>the</strong>ologies. He convincingly argues that <strong>the</strong> trained<br />

<strong>the</strong>ologian has an important but limited role in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological process. According<br />

to Bevans, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ologian’s role is to articulate more clearly <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

community, ‘deepening <strong>the</strong>ir ideas … and challenging <strong>the</strong>m to broaden <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

horizons….’ Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, as <strong>the</strong> context is taken seriously in <strong>contextual</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology,<br />

‘<strong>the</strong>ology cannot be understood as a ‘finished product, produced by experts, that is<br />

merely delivered to a Christian community for its consumption,’ and at <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, ‘<strong>the</strong>ology cannot be <strong>the</strong> mere recording <strong>of</strong> what “<strong>the</strong> people think.”’ Instead,<br />

<strong>the</strong>ology must be ‘an activity <strong>of</strong> dialogue, emerging out <strong>of</strong> a mutual respect<br />

between’ <strong>the</strong> faith community and ‘listening pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.’ 88<br />

As Anderson observes, Pentecostal <strong>the</strong>ology is ‘more than written and academic<br />

<strong>the</strong>ology,’ but is ‘found in <strong>the</strong> preaching, rituals and practices <strong>of</strong> churches.’ He<br />

refers to <strong>the</strong> ‘enacted <strong>the</strong>ology’ (<strong>the</strong>ology in practice) seen in global<br />

Pentecostalism. 89 While discussing <strong>the</strong> problems <strong>of</strong> Pentecostal traditioning,<br />

Simon Chan points out that <strong>the</strong> ‘strength <strong>of</strong> Pentecostal traditioning lies in its<br />

powerful narratives,’ but its ‘weakness lies in its inability to explain itself.’ 90<br />

87<br />

Schreiter, Constructing Local Theologies, 18.<br />

88<br />

Bevans, Models <strong>of</strong> Contextual Theology, 17-18.<br />

89<br />

Allan Anderson, ‘The Contextual Pentecostal Theology <strong>of</strong> David Yonggi Cho,’ AJPS 7, no.1<br />

(1999): 102.<br />

90<br />

Simon Chan, Pentecostal Theology and <strong>the</strong> Christian Spiritual Tradition, JPTS Series 21<br />

(Sheffield: SAP, 2000), 20.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!