03.04.2013 Views

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

a contextual missiology of the spirit - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

current study shows. To put it ano<strong>the</strong>r way, <strong>the</strong> emphasis is on <strong>the</strong> sovereignty <strong>of</strong><br />

God <strong>the</strong> Spirit in mission in a pneumatological Pentecostal <strong>missiology</strong>.<br />

It seems that <strong>the</strong> current debate within <strong>the</strong> pneumatological <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> religions<br />

is centred on <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> discernment. The most common discernment argued for<br />

is Christological. However, it is argued that a genuine pneumatological <strong>the</strong>ology<br />

should use pneumato-centric Christology for discernment. Roland Allen, a<br />

pioneer thinker in linking pneumatology to <strong>missiology</strong>, is significant in this<br />

respect. According to him:<br />

We believe that it is <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>of</strong> Christ which inspires and guides us: we<br />

can not believe that <strong>the</strong> same Spirit will guide and inspire <strong>the</strong>m [our converts,<br />

new believers, new churches, younger churches]. We believe that <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit<br />

has taught us and is teaching us true conceptions <strong>of</strong> morality, doctrine, ritual: we<br />

can not believe that <strong>the</strong> same Spirit will teach <strong>the</strong>m. 99<br />

K. Kim’s discussion on <strong>the</strong> debate <strong>of</strong> discernment seems to be useful from <strong>the</strong><br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> a pneumatological <strong>missiology</strong> as <strong>the</strong> Spirit dimension is clear. She<br />

discusses four useful biblical criteria for discernment, for she affirms that ‘<strong>the</strong><br />

Christian contribution to <strong>the</strong> debate <strong>of</strong> discernment will always be Christ-centred.’<br />

The first is ecclesial, ‘<strong>the</strong> confession <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ as Lord by <strong>the</strong> Christian<br />

community,’ with <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit. The second is ethical, ‘<strong>the</strong> evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fruits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit… in <strong>the</strong> up-building <strong>of</strong> community.’ The third is<br />

charismatic, ‘<strong>the</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gifts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit,’ and <strong>the</strong> fourth is liberational,<br />

‘consideration for <strong>the</strong> poor,’ as <strong>the</strong> Spirit anointed Jesus announced (Lk 4:18). She<br />

99 Roland Allen. Missionary Methods: St. Paul’s or Ours? (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1962), 143-<br />

44. He critiques <strong>the</strong> foreign missionaries’ hesitation to trust <strong>the</strong> local churches and leaders.<br />

289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!