KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Part and Whole 103<br />
Some or all parts of an organized system can themselves be<br />
mere aggregates. Some or all parts of an aggregate can themselves<br />
be organized systems. Leibniz's most common example of an organized<br />
system is a watch or an automaton; and of an aggregate it is a<br />
basket of fish or a pond full of fish. However, if the parts of an organized<br />
system are organized and their parts in turn are also organized,<br />
then the system is an organism. 58<br />
So each organic body belonging to a living being is a kind of divine<br />
machine or natural automaton infinitely surpassing all artificial automata.<br />
For a machine made by human art is not a machine in each of its parts; for<br />
example, the tooth of a brass wheel has parts or fragments which are not<br />
artificial so far as we are concerned, and which no longer bear any traces of<br />
the machine, for the use of which the wheel was intended. But the<br />
machines of nature, living bodies, are still machines in their smallest parts,<br />
into infinity. It is this that makes the difference between nature and art, that<br />
is, between the divine art and ours.<br />
Kant criticizes this theory of the organism in the resolution of the<br />
Second Antinomy.<br />
Part and Whole<br />
In the first section of the antinomies chapter Kant introduced<br />
the cosmological idea of the completeness of division and designated<br />
the pursuit of the series of conditions as a regressive synthesis:<br />
reality in space, i.e. matter, is a conditioned. Its internal conditions are its<br />
parts, and the parts of these parts its remote conditions. There thus occurs a<br />
regressive synthesis, the absolute totality of which is demanded by reason ...<br />
(B440)<br />
Although Kant holds that an empirical space is conditioned by the<br />
space surrounding it, i.e. that the parts of space are conditioned by<br />
the whole (the surrounding subspace), he nowhere adduces an<br />
argument as to why just the opposite should be the case with respect<br />
to matter. Kant apparently thinks it self-evident that a material<br />
whole is conditioned by its parts and not by the larger whole of<br />
which it is a part. In his metaphysics lecture of 1763 Kant had said<br />
that "all composition is a contingent nexus, a mere accidens," 59 but<br />
58 "Monadology," §64; GP VI,618; PPL, 649.<br />
59 Ak 28,1,29 (Herder's notes).