01.05.2013 Views

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part and Whole 103<br />

Some or all parts of an organized system can themselves be<br />

mere aggregates. Some or all parts of an aggregate can themselves<br />

be organized systems. Leibniz's most common example of an organized<br />

system is a watch or an automaton; and of an aggregate it is a<br />

basket of fish or a pond full of fish. However, if the parts of an organized<br />

system are organized and their parts in turn are also organized,<br />

then the system is an organism. 58<br />

So each organic body belonging to a living being is a kind of divine<br />

machine or natural automaton infinitely surpassing all artificial automata.<br />

For a machine made by human art is not a machine in each of its parts; for<br />

example, the tooth of a brass wheel has parts or fragments which are not<br />

artificial so far as we are concerned, and which no longer bear any traces of<br />

the machine, for the use of which the wheel was intended. But the<br />

machines of nature, living bodies, are still machines in their smallest parts,<br />

into infinity. It is this that makes the difference between nature and art, that<br />

is, between the divine art and ours.<br />

Kant criticizes this theory of the organism in the resolution of the<br />

Second Antinomy.<br />

Part and Whole<br />

In the first section of the antinomies chapter Kant introduced<br />

the cosmological idea of the completeness of division and designated<br />

the pursuit of the series of conditions as a regressive synthesis:<br />

reality in space, i.e. matter, is a conditioned. Its internal conditions are its<br />

parts, and the parts of these parts its remote conditions. There thus occurs a<br />

regressive synthesis, the absolute totality of which is demanded by reason ...<br />

(B440)<br />

Although Kant holds that an empirical space is conditioned by the<br />

space surrounding it, i.e. that the parts of space are conditioned by<br />

the whole (the surrounding subspace), he nowhere adduces an<br />

argument as to why just the opposite should be the case with respect<br />

to matter. Kant apparently thinks it self-evident that a material<br />

whole is conditioned by its parts and not by the larger whole of<br />

which it is a part. In his metaphysics lecture of 1763 Kant had said<br />

that "all composition is a contingent nexus, a mere accidens," 59 but<br />

58 "Monadology," §64; GP VI,618; PPL, 649.<br />

59 Ak 28,1,29 (Herder's notes).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!