KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20 Theory of the Organism<br />
cated to new particles of matter vitally united to the living plant, in a like<br />
continued organization conformable to that sort of plants.<br />
Newtonian Biology<br />
The preformation theory, which forsaw no production of<br />
organic systems after the first creation, could cope even less well<br />
with the continual reproduction of such systems. The encased<br />
germs did not reproduce; they simply expanded. The theories of<br />
identical and extended reproduction of organic systems proposed as<br />
alternatives to preformation were called at the time "epigenesis";<br />
and this term has been adopted by contemporary historiography of<br />
science even though these theories have little or nothing to do with<br />
the Aristotelian theory of generation for which William Harvey, its<br />
last important proponent, introduced the name in the middle of the<br />
17th century. The first alternative theories of the 1740's were in fact<br />
pangenesis theories, developed by Buffon and Maupertuis, which<br />
harked back to the atomistic theories of the 17th century (Gassendi,<br />
Highmore, Charleton) or perhaps directly to Lucretius and Hippocrates<br />
but were enriched by organic molecules and by attractive<br />
forces acting between the particles of matter. Pangenesis explained<br />
generation through the mixing of the seeds of both parents. The seed<br />
in turn consisted of particles, taken from and representing each of<br />
the parts of the body, which joined together either spontaneously or<br />
under the influence of the maternal organism to form a germ,<br />
which otherwise was quite similar to the homunculus of the preformation<br />
theory. Pangenesis had little difficulty with species hybrids<br />
or with atomism and was independent of theories of the history of<br />
the earth. Furthermore, at least in Buffon's version, it was founded<br />
on the concept of the reproduction of an organic system. For Buffon,<br />
nourishment, growth, and propagation were three kinds of general<br />
reproduction accomplished by distribution and assimilation of particles.<br />
When Buffon for instance says: "Everything, that can be, is,"<br />
he means that all viable forms of organization that result from the<br />
combinatory possibilities of organic molecules under the given geological<br />
and climatic conditions actually exist; and vice versa only the<br />
actually given forms are really possible. This holds in principle<br />
whether the molecules happen to get together in the appropriate