KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
86 The Unconditioned and the Infinite Series<br />
matical" antinomies. First let me present some examples of the<br />
stylized technical vocabulary:<br />
regress<br />
from the conditioned to<br />
the condition<br />
retreat<br />
ascends<br />
regressive synthesis<br />
on the side of the<br />
conditions<br />
in antecedentia<br />
ascending line<br />
(B438, B539-540)<br />
progress<br />
from the condition to the<br />
conditioned<br />
advance<br />
descends<br />
progressive synthesis<br />
on the side of the<br />
conditioned<br />
in consequentia<br />
descending line<br />
(B438, 539-40)<br />
While Kant is not entirely consistent in his use of this vocabulary<br />
(for instance, he occasionally "advances" through a regress), it<br />
will only then be possible to recognize the problems which force him<br />
to deviate from the paradigm if we first presuppose the rule. Only<br />
then can we distinguish between simple mistakes or infelicities of<br />
presentation and serious difficulties with the material. In particular,<br />
the Second Antinomy, which is essential for the discussion of<br />
the antinomy of judgment in the next chapter, cannot be understood<br />
without clear terminological distinctions. The subsequent analysis<br />
will be carried out in three steps: 1) Kant's distinction between an<br />
infinite and indefinitely continued series will be presented; 2) the<br />
regress in indefinitum will be examined on the example of the question<br />
of the beginning of the world, 3) some structural inconsistencies<br />
involving the second part of the First Antinomy (size of the world)<br />
will be exposed.<br />
The Concept of Infinity<br />
1) In infinitum and in indefinitum<br />
A synthetic series is either finite or infinite in the sense that<br />
the regress or progress in the series is either finite or can be continued<br />
to infinity. The "infinite" of both regress and progress is a<br />
potential infinity. The assertion that such a progress or regress can<br />
be completed, i.e. that the set of elements in the series can actually