01.05.2013 Views

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Newtonian Biology 21<br />

womb or somewhere else (spontaneous generation), whether they<br />

meet here on earth today or whether they met on Jupiter twenty<br />

thousand years ago. All organisms are completely determined by<br />

the properties and interactions of the particles of which they consist;<br />

should a world catastrophe occur wiping out all living creatures,<br />

but leaving the basic geological and climatic conditions, then all<br />

species of organisms would return spontaneously. The organization<br />

forms of the species are not encased as germs, but rather stamped<br />

onto the structure of matter in the combinatorial possibilities of<br />

organic molecules and the underlying anorganic particles.<br />

Mosquitoes and elephants are just as determined as crystals.<br />

The appeal to the combinatory possibilites of the particles and<br />

the limitation of the number of such possible forms may explain<br />

why there are precisely those species that there are. However the<br />

question, why the abilites that the organisms have based on their<br />

organization can be relatively independent of that organization<br />

could not be answered so easily. In regeneration, the paradigmatic<br />

example of life processes, parts of the organization are missing, that<br />

is, the form as a whole does not exist, but the functions are nonetheless<br />

performed. The logical solution to the problem was to introduce<br />

a new primary property of matter, a vital force, which was<br />

however limited in that it only came to expression under certain<br />

circumstances, for instance in a particular arrangement of particles.<br />

This solution is usually called vitalism; and in the 18th century<br />

it was almost always introduced with an analogy to the Newtonian<br />

force of gravity. With this analogy Buffon introduced his<br />

"moule interieure," Haller his "irritability," and Blumenbach his<br />

"Bildungstrieb"; similar arguments can be found in the work of<br />

Bordeu, Barthez, Hunter and Needham. 15<br />

The vitalism of the latter 18th century stipulated that life<br />

could not be reduced to the fundamental properties of matter postulated<br />

by mechanics. It was necessary therefore to introduce a new<br />

primary property of matter — the life force — which played no role<br />

in mechanics and which became active only under a certain constellation<br />

of factors; the life force was however not reducible to or caused<br />

15 Cf. John Hunter, "Lectures on the Principles of Surgery," in : The Works,<br />

London, 1835, vol I, p. 221ff; Théophile Bordeu, "Recherches sur les maladies<br />

chroniques," Oeuvres complètes; vol. II, Paris, 1818, pp. 924f; Johann Friedrich<br />

Blumenbach, Über den Bildungstrieb, Göttingen, 1789, pp. 25f. Cf. also Hall<br />

"Biological Analogues," for further sources.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!